Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16034971›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Inhaled beta2-agonists for treating non-specific chronic cough in children.

A A T Tomerak, H Vyas, M Lakenpaul, J J M McGlashan, M McKean

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Inhaled beta2-agonists for treating non-specific chronic cough in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005
    Pooled it
  3. Latino-white disparities in ICD-coded asthma diagnosis among US children.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Analysis of the Literature on Chronic Cough in Children.The open respiratory medicine journal · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Asthma.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Whooping cough in general practice.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A A T TomerakDepartment of Child Health, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. ahmedtomerak@hotmail.com
H Vyas
M Lakenpaul
J J M McGlashan
M McKean
Queen's Medical Centre · GBQueen's University · CARoyal Victoria Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pathophysiology of so called 'cough variant asthma' has not received a great deal of research interest and opinion lies divided as to whether it is really asthma or not. The proponents of cough variant asthma suggest a therapeutic trial of medications usually used to treat asthma

objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of inhaled ss2 agonists in non-specific chronic cough in children over the age of 2 years. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Airways Group database (including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCRT) were searched. Additional searching included hand searching of medical journals through the Cochrane Collaboration, references, references of references listed in primary sources and personal communication with authors. In addition "Grey literature" including theses, internal reports, non-peer reviewed journals were sought. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised (randomised and quasi-randomised) controlled clinical trials in which inhaled ss2 agonists were given for chronic cough in children over 2 years of age were included. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data for trials of salbutamol versus placebo were extracted by both reviewers and entered into the Cochrane Collaboration software program Review Manager, version 4.2 MAIN

resultsIn children presenting with isolated chronic cough there was no significant difference between salbutamol treated group and placebo group. AUTHORS'

conclusionsSalbutamol was no different from placebo in reducing the frequency of cough measured objectively or scored subjectively.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAlbuterolChildChronic DiseaseCoughHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAlbuterol

Identifiers

PMID16034971
PMCPMC8885309
OpenAlexW2108525959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.