Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16034967›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Adalimumab for treating rheumatoid arthritis.

F Navarro-Sarabia, R Ariza-Ariza, B Hernandez-Cruz, I Villanueva

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for rheumatoid arthritis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Biologic interventions for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  9. Efficacy and safety of infliximab-biosimilar compared to other biological drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a mixed treatment comparison.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2014
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia in rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  12. Adverse effects of biologics: a network meta-analysis and Cochrane overview.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  13. Golimumab for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  14. Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of Cochrane reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  15. Abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  16. Anakinra for rheumatoid arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

F Navarro-SarabiaRheumatology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Dr Fedriani, 3, Seville, Spain, 41009. federiconavarro@supercable.es
R Ariza-Ariza
B Hernandez-Cruz
I Villanueva
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESArizona Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdalimumab is a fully human anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody. Published studies indicate that its use in patients with RA can be effective and safe.

objectivesThe aim of this review was to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in the treatment of RA. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic databases were searched up to August, 2004: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EBM Reviews (CDSR, ACP Journal Club, DARE and CENTRAL) and Health STAR. Conference proceedings were hand searched and pharmaceutical companies were contacted to obtain additional unpublished data from published trials. Adalimumab was searched as a text word as it is not currently indexed. The search was not limited by language, year of publication or type of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing adalimumab alone or in combination with DMARDs to placebo or other DMARDs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently collected the data in a standardized form and assessed the methodological quality of the trial using validated criteria. Outcome measures included ACR and EULAR responses, DAS 28 and components of ACR response and radiographic data. Safety data were also included. Continuous data were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI), absolute benefit (AB) and relative difference (RD). Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI, absolute risk difference (ARD) or risk difference (RDiff) with 95%CI and number needed to treat (NNT) or to harm (NNH). When significant heterogeneity was not found, data were pooled. MAIN

resultsSix studies with 2381 patients were included in this review. Two comparisons were done: A. adalimumab subcutaneously (sc) + methotrexate (or DMARDs) versus placebo sc + methotrexate (or DMARDs). B. adalimumab sc in monotherapy versus placebo sc. In the comparison A, with adalimumab 40 mg every other week (e.o.w.), the RR to achieve an ACR 20 response at 24 weeks ranged in the included studies from 1.52 to 4.63, and the NNT ranged from 1.9 to 5.4. The RR (95%CI) to achieve an ACR 50 response was 4.63 (3.04-7.05), and the NNT was 3.0 (95%CI 2.0-6.0). The RR (95%CI) to achieve an ACR 70 response was 5.14 (3.14-8.41) and the number needed to treat was 7.0 (95%CI 5.0-13.0). At 52 weeks, the RRs (95%CI) to achieve an ACR 20, 50, and 70 response were 2.46 (1.87-3.22), 4.37 (2.77-6.91), and 5.15 (2.60-10.22), with NNTs of 2.9, 3.1, and 5.3, respectively. At 52 weeks, adalimumab 40 mg e.o.w. and 20 mg every week (e.w.) significantly slowed the radiological progression including Sharp modified index, erosion score, and joint space score (only with 40 mg e.o.w.). In the comparison B, with adalimumab 40 mg e.o w. , the RRs to achieve an ACR 20, 50, and 70 response at 24/26 weeks were 1.91 (1.17-3.10), 2.84 (1.58-5.12), and 7.33 (2.25-33.90) with NNTs of 5.0 (95%CI 3.0-9.0), 7.0 (4.0-20.0), and 9.0 (3.0-38.0), respectively. In most of the analysed studies and comparisons, there were not significant differences in safety outcomes between adalimumab and control groups. The development of positive antinuclear antibodies was significantly more frequent in adalimumab patients than in placebo patients. Serious infections were significantly more frequent in adalimumab patients in only one study (Keystone 2004) with a RR (95%CI) of 7.64(1.02-57.18) and a NNH of 30.2. AUTHORS'

conclusionsOn the basis of the studies reviewed here, adalimumab in combination with methotrexate is efficacious and safe in the treatment of the rheumatoid arthritis. Adalimumab 40 mg sc e.o.w. and 20 mg e.w. slows the radiographic progression at 52 weeks. Adalimumab in combination with DMARDs other than methotrexate is also efficacious and safe, even though data from one only study are available and the number of patients in each group is low. Adalimumab in monotherapy is efficacious and safe in the treatment of the rheumatoid arthritis but the effect size is lower than with combined therapy.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMethotrexateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdalimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID16034967
PMCPMC12140617
OpenAlexW2135453000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.