Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16034957›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Drugs for treating uncomplicated malaria in pregnant women.

L Orton, P Garner

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drugs for treating uncomplicated malaria in pregnant women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L OrtonCentre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Alcuin B, Heslington, UK, YO10 5DD. lo52@york.ac.uk
P Garner
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen are more vulnerable to malaria during pregnancy, and malaria infection may have adverse consequences for the fetus. Identifying safe and effective treatments is important.

objectivesTo compare the effects of drug regimens for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnant women. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register (May 2005), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2005), EMBASE (1974 to May 2005), LILACS (May 2005), reference lists, and conference abstracts. We also contacted researchers in the field, organizations, and pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of antimalarial drugs for treating uncomplicated malaria in pregnant women. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors assessed trial eligibility and methodological quality, and extracted data. We performed a quantitative analysis only where we could combine the data. We combined dichotomous data using relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN

resultsSix trials (513 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Two were quasi-randomized, and none described allocation concealment. Data were scarce for the primary outcome, treatment failure. One trial compared artesunate plus mefloquine with quinine and reported fewer treatment failures at day 63 with the combination (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.38; 106 participants). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is insufficient reliable research on malaria treatment options in pregnancy.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsFemaleHumansMalariaMefloquinePregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStillbirthAntimalarialsMefloquine

Identifiers

PMID16034957
OpenAlexW4256044689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.