Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16034951›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis.

L E Ziganshina, A A Vizel, S B Squire

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis (presumed drug-sensitive).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New antituberculous drugs in development.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2010
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis.Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

L E ZiganshinaClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Kazan State Medical Academy for Postgraduate Medical Education, 11 Mushtari Street, 420012, 14-15 Malaya Krasnaya Street, 420015, Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia, 420012. lezign@hotmail.com
A A Vizel
S B Squire
Kazan State Medical Academy · RUKazan State Medical University · RULiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluoroquinolones are sometimes used to treat multiple-drug-resistant and drug-sensitive tuberculosis. The effects of fluoroquinolones in tuberculosis regimens need to be assessed.

objectivesTo assess fluoroquinolones as additional or substitute components to antituberculous drug regimens for drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tuberculosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register (April 2005), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2005), EMBASE (1974 to April 2005), LILACS (1982 to April 2005), Science Citation Index (1940 to April 2005), and Russian database (1988 to April 2005). We also scanned reference lists of all identified studies and contacted researchers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of antituberculous regimens containing fluoroquinolones in people diagnosed with bacteriologically positive (sputum smear or culture) pulmonary tuberculosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently applied inclusion criteria, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data. We used relative risk (RR) for dichotomous data, weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous data (both with 95% confidence intervals (CI)), and the random-effects model if we detected heterogeneity and appropriate to combine data. MAIN

resultsTen trials (1178 participants) met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant difference was found in trials substituting ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin for first-line drugs in relation to cure (89 participants, 2 trials), treatment failure (388 participants, 3 trials), or clinical or radiological improvement (216 participants, 2 trials). Substituting ciprofloxacin into first-line regimens in drug-sensitive tuberculosis led to a higher incidence of relapse (RR 7.17, 95% CI 1.33 to 38.58; 384 participants, 3 trials) and longer time to sputum culture conversion (WMD 0.50 months, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.82; 168 participants, 1 trial), although this was confined to HIV-positive participants. Adding or substituting levofloxacin to basic regimens in drug-resistant areas had no effect. A comparison of sparfloxacin versus ofloxacin added to regimens showed no statistically significant difference in cure (184 participants, 2 trials), treatment failure (149 participants, 2 trials), or total number of adverse events (253 participants, 3 trials). AUTHORS'

conclusionsOnly ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, and sparfloxacin have been tested in randomized controlled trials for treating tuberculosis. We cannot recommend ciprofloxacin in treating tuberculosis. Trials of newer fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis are needed. No difference has been demonstrated between sparfloxacin and ofloxacin in drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsCiprofloxacinFluoroquinolonesHumansLevofloxacinOfloxacinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntitubercular AgentsCiprofloxacinFluoroquinolonesLevofloxacinOfloxacinsparfloxacin

Identifiers

PMID16034951
OpenAlexW2149860604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.