SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Prophylactic oral betamimetics for reducing preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Vaginal progesterone for preventing preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Pooled it
- Prophylactic oral betamimetics for reducing preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Antenatal interventions to reduce preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews.BMC research notes · 2014Pooled it
- Betamimetics for inhibiting preterm labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Transvaginal sonographic cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2010Pooled it
- Prophylactic oral betamimetics for preventing preterm labour in singleton pregnancies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Development and validation of a prediction model on spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.Reproductive health · 2023Article
- How to screen the cervix and reduce the risk of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic women without a prior preterm birth.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2023Article
- Interventions for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a scoping review of systematic reviews.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Review
- Acute Tocolysis - a Critical Analysis of Evidence-Based Data.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2018Article
- Spontaneous preterm birth prevention in multiple pregnancy.The obstetrician & gynaecologist : the journal for continuing professional development from the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists · 2018Review
- Evidence for perinatal and child health care guidelines in crisis settings: can Cochrane help?BMC public health · 2010Article
- Preterm birth in twin pregnancies: Clinical outcomes and predictive parameters.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTwin pregnancies are associated with a high risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity due to an increased rate of preterm birth. Betamimetics can decrease contraction frequency or delay preterm birth in singleton pregnancies by 24 to 48 hours. The efficacy of oral betamimetics in women with a twin pregnancy is unproven.
objectivesTo assess the effects of prophylactic oral betamimetics administered to women with twin pregnancies. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (May 2004), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2004), MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2004), EMBASE (January 1985 to May 2004), and reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials in twin pregnancies comparing oral betamimetics with placebo or any intervention with the specific aim of preventing preterm birth. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Standard methods of The Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group were used. Trials were independently assessed for methodological quality by at least two authors, who extracted data using a data collection form. MAIN
resultsFive trials (344 twin pregnancies) were included. All trials compared oral betamimetics to placebo. Betamimetics reduced the incidence of preterm labour (one trial, 50 twin pregnancies, relative risk (RR) 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.86). However, betamimetics did not reduce preterm birth less than 37 weeks' gestation (four trials, 276 twin pregnancies, RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.10) or less than 34 weeks' gestation (one trial, 144 twin pregnancies, RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.15 to 1.50). Mean neonatal birthweight in the betamimetic group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (three trials, 478 neonates, weighted mean difference 111.2 grams; 95% CI 22.2 to 200.2). Nevertheless, there was no evidence of an effect of betamimetics in reduction of low birthweight (two trials, 366 neonates, RR 1.19; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.85) or small-for-gestational age neonates (two trials, 178 neonates, RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.65). Two trials (388 neonates) showed that betamimetics significantly reduced the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome but the difference was not significant when the analysis was adjusted for correlation of babies from twins. Three trials (452 neonates) showed no evidence of an effect of betamimetics in reducing neonatal mortality (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.82). AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of prophylactic oral betamimetics for preventing preterm birth in women with a twin pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16034944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.