Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16034927›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Fluid restriction for term infants with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy following perinatal asphyxia.

Z Kecskes, G Healy, A Jensen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Perinatal asphyxia.BMJ clinical evidence · 2007
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Does fluid restriction improve outcomes in infants with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy? A pilot randomized controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Trial
  7. Evaluation of risk factors and outcomes of neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and acute kidney injury.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Neonatal resuscitation in low-resource settings: what, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up?International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2009
    Review
  14. Post-resuscitation management of asphyxiated neonates.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2008
    Article
  15. Treatment of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in newborns.Current treatment options in neurology · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Z Kecskes
G Healy
A Jensen
Royal Women's Hospital · AUCanberra Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent recommendations to control the consequences of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy following perinatal asphyxia include the careful management of fluids, with avoidance of fluid overload and thus avoidance of cerebral oedema. Recommendations for fluid restriction in a neonate are based on the experience of restricting fluid intake in adults or older children. The extrapolation from studies in adults, older children and animals to the human neonate is fraught with hazard due to the different physiology and mechanisms of injury.

objectivesThe objective of this review was to determine the effects of fluid restriction on short-term (mortality within the first 28 days of life, grade of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, electrolyte disturbances, renal function, seizure activity) and long-term outcomes (death during the first year of life, CT or MRI changes, or severe neurodevelopmental disability at or equal to 12 months of age or more) in term infants following perinatal asphyxia. Subgroup analyses were planned on the basis of the severity of the resulting hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, degree of fluid restriction, and length of fluid restriction. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were undertaken of MEDLINE October 2004 back to 1966, CINAHL back to 1966, the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004). Searches were made of previous reviews including cross-references and abstracts. The search was not limited to the English language; reports in foreign languages were translated. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised trials of fluid restriction in term newborn infants with perinatal asphyxia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No studies were found meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review. MAIN

resultsNo studies were found meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review. AUTHORS'

conclusionsGiven that fluid restriction for the treatment of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy following perinatal asphyxia is recommended in standard textbooks, there is a need for randomised, controlled trials to establish if this practice affects mortality and morbidity. As it may not be ethical to include neonates with acute renal failure in a randomised trial, these babies will have to be excluded from the trial. These studies should investigate the effects of fluid management on outcomes such as mortality, seizure activity, evidence of cerebral damage on histology, and effects on renal function and electrolytes.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyAsphyxia NeonatorumBrain EdemaHumansHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainInfant, Newborn

Identifiers

PMID16034927
PMCPMC6599869
OpenAlexW1902645249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.