Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16034920›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Conservative management of symptomatic and/or complicated haemorrhoids in pregnancy and the puerperium.

C E Quijano, E Abalos

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Phlebotonics for haemorrhoids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Japanese Practice Guidelines for Anal Disorders I. Hemorrhoids.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Conservative and surgical treatment of haemorrhoids.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013
    Review
  17. [Consensus statement haemorrhoidal disease].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2012
    Article
  18. Hemorrhoids in pregnancy.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2008
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C E QuijanoCentro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Pueyrredon 985, Rosario, Argentina, 2000. crep@crep.com.ar
E Abalos
Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaemorrhoids (piles) are swollen veins at or near the anus, normally asymptomatic. They do not constitute a disease, unless they become symptomatic. Pregnancy and the puerperium predispose to symptomatic haemorrhoids, being the most common ano-rectal disease at these stages. Symptoms are usually mild and transient and include intermittent bleeding from the anus and pain. Depending on the degree of pain, quality of life could be affected, varying from mild discomfort to real difficulty in dealing with the activities of everyday life. Treatment during pregnancy is mainly directed to the relief of symptoms, especially pain control. The so-called conservative management includes dietary modifications, stimulants or depressants of the bowel transit, local treatment, and phlebotonics (drugs that cause decreased capillary fragility, improving the microcirculation in venous insufficiency). For many women, symptoms will resolve spontaneously soon after birth, and so any corrective treatment is usually deferred to some time after birth. Thus, the objective of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of conservative management of piles during pregnancy and the puerperium.

objectivesTo determine the possible benefits, risks and side-effects of the conservative management of symptomatic haemorrhoids during pregnancy and the puerperium. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (30 June 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised-controlled trials comparing any of the conservative treatments for symptomatic haemorrhoids during pregnancy and the puerperium (such as dietary modifications, stimulant/depressant of the bowel transit, local treatments, drugs that improve the microcirculation in venous insufficiency) with a placebo or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed a methodological assessment for deciding which studies to include/exclude from the review and extracted data. MAIN

resultsFrom 10 potentially eligible studies, two were included in this review (150 women). Both compared oral rutosides against placebo. Rutosides seem to be effective in reducing the signs identified by the healthcare provider, and symptoms and signs reported by women, of haemorrhoidal disease. For the outcome no response to treatment: relative risk 0.07, 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 0.20. Regarding perinatal outcomes, one fetal death and one congenital malformation (possible not related to exposure) were reported in the control and treatment group respectively. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAlthough the treatment with oral hydroxyethylrutosides looks promising for symptom relief in first and second degree haemorrhoids, its use cannot be recommended until new evidence reassures women and their clinicians about their safety. The most commonly used approaches, such as dietary modifications and local treatments, were not properly evaluated during pregnancy and the puerperium.

Indexed as

FemaleHemorrhoidsHumansHydroxyethylrutosidePregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularPuerperal DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVasoconstrictor AgentsHydroxyethylrutosideVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID16034920
PMCPMC8763308
OpenAlexW1734706510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.