SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Conservative management of symptomatic and/or complicated haemorrhoids in pregnancy and the puerperium.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recurrence Rates and Pharmacological Treatment for Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Systematic Review.Advances in therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Phlebotonics for haemorrhoids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Benign lesions prolapsing through the anus: a differential diagnostic algorithm and evidence-based surgical management-a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- From venous congestion to placental hypoxia: the underappreciated role of chronic venous disease in impaired placenta development and pregnancy health.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- A Gender Perspective on Coloproctological Diseases: A Narrative Review on Female Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Haemorrhoidal disease in pregnancy: results from a self-assessment questionnaire administered by means of a social network.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Haemorrhoids and Anal Fissures in Pregnancy: Predictive Factors and Effective Treatments.Cureus · 2024Article
- Perianal Diseases in Pregnancy and After Childbirth: Frequency, Risk Factors, Impact on Women's Quality of Life and Treatment Methods.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
- A Prospective Study on the Efficacy of Two Different Phlebotonic Therapies as a Bridge to Surgery in Patients with Advanced Hemorrhoidal Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a Compound of Micronized Flavonoids in Combination With Vitamin C and Extracts ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.Techniques in coloproctology · 2020Review
- Hemorrhoid management in women: the role of tribenoside + lidocaine.Drugs in context · 2019Review
- Japanese Practice Guidelines for Anal Disorders I. Hemorrhoids.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2017Review
- Evaluation and management of hemorrhoids: Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) consensus statement.Techniques in coloproctology · 2015Article
- Pregnancy and postpartum bowel changes: constipation and fecal incontinence.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
- Conservative and surgical treatment of haemorrhoids.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013Review
- [Consensus statement haemorrhoidal disease].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2012Article
- Hemorrhoids in pregnancy.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2008Article
- A review of the methodological features of systematic reviews in maternal medicine.BMC medicine · 2007Review
- Review of evidence for environmental causes of uveal coloboma.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaemorrhoids (piles) are swollen veins at or near the anus, normally asymptomatic. They do not constitute a disease, unless they become symptomatic. Pregnancy and the puerperium predispose to symptomatic haemorrhoids, being the most common ano-rectal disease at these stages. Symptoms are usually mild and transient and include intermittent bleeding from the anus and pain. Depending on the degree of pain, quality of life could be affected, varying from mild discomfort to real difficulty in dealing with the activities of everyday life. Treatment during pregnancy is mainly directed to the relief of symptoms, especially pain control. The so-called conservative management includes dietary modifications, stimulants or depressants of the bowel transit, local treatment, and phlebotonics (drugs that cause decreased capillary fragility, improving the microcirculation in venous insufficiency). For many women, symptoms will resolve spontaneously soon after birth, and so any corrective treatment is usually deferred to some time after birth. Thus, the objective of this review is to evaluate the efficacy of conservative management of piles during pregnancy and the puerperium.
objectivesTo determine the possible benefits, risks and side-effects of the conservative management of symptomatic haemorrhoids during pregnancy and the puerperium. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (30 June 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised-controlled trials comparing any of the conservative treatments for symptomatic haemorrhoids during pregnancy and the puerperium (such as dietary modifications, stimulant/depressant of the bowel transit, local treatments, drugs that improve the microcirculation in venous insufficiency) with a placebo or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed a methodological assessment for deciding which studies to include/exclude from the review and extracted data. MAIN
resultsFrom 10 potentially eligible studies, two were included in this review (150 women). Both compared oral rutosides against placebo. Rutosides seem to be effective in reducing the signs identified by the healthcare provider, and symptoms and signs reported by women, of haemorrhoidal disease. For the outcome no response to treatment: relative risk 0.07, 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 0.20. Regarding perinatal outcomes, one fetal death and one congenital malformation (possible not related to exposure) were reported in the control and treatment group respectively. AUTHORS'
conclusionsAlthough the treatment with oral hydroxyethylrutosides looks promising for symptom relief in first and second degree haemorrhoids, its use cannot be recommended until new evidence reassures women and their clinicians about their safety. The most commonly used approaches, such as dietary modifications and local treatments, were not properly evaluated during pregnancy and the puerperium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.