SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Inhaled fluticasone at different doses for chronic asthma in adults and children.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of corticosteroids in young children with acute respiratory conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Ciclesonide versus other inhaled steroids for chronic asthma in children and adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Fluticasone versus beclomethasone or budesonide for chronic asthma in adults and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007Pooled it
- Fluticasone versus HFA-beclomethasone dipropionate for chronic asthma in adults and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Is low dose inhaled corticosteroid therapy as effective for inflammation and remodeling in asthma? A randomized, parallel group study.Respiratory research · 2012Trial
- Fluticasone/formoterol combination therapy is as effective as fluticasone/salmeterol in the treatment of asthma, but has a more rapid onset of action: an open-label, randomized study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2011Trial
- Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate in pediatric asthma patients: a randomized controlled trial.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseTrial
- Inhaled Corticosteroid Use and Self-Reported Voice Problems in a Nordic Population-Based Cohort.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Asthma, classical conditioning, and the autonomic nervous system - a hypothesis for why children wheeze.Archives of disease in childhood · 2024Review
- Comparison of Two Therapies on Asthma Control in Children.Pediatric allergy, immunology, and pulmonology · 2020Article
- Long-Term Fluticasone Propionate/Formoterol Fumarate Combination Therapy Is Associated with a Low Incidence of Severe Asthma Exacerbations.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2016Article
- Clinical utility and development of the fluticasone/formoterol combination formulation (Flutiform(®)) for the treatment of asthma.Drug design, development and therapy · 2014Review
- Growth abnormalities in children with type 1 diabetes, juvenile chronic arthritis, and asthma.International journal of endocrinology · 2014Review
- Inhaled corticosteroids and the occurrence of oral candidiasis: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis.Drug safety · 2013Article
- Steroid responsiveness and wheezing phenotypes.Paediatric respiratory reviews · 2011Review
- An integrative review of systematic reviews related to the management of breathlessness in respiratory illnesses.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2010Review
- Exploratory study on oxygen consumption on-kinetics during treadmill walking in women with systemic lupus erythematosus.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2010Article
- Asthma control in adolescents: role of leukotriene inhibitors.Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a high-potency inhaled corticosteroid used in the treatment of asthma.
objectives1. To assess the efficacy and safety outcomes of inhaled fluticasone at different nominal daily doses in the treatment of chronic asthma. 2. To test for the presence of a dose-response effect. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Trials Register (January 2005) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997 to 2004). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials in children and adults comparing fluticasone at different nominal daily doses in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer extracted data. These were checked and verified by a second reviewer. Quantitative analyses where undertaken using RevMan (Analyses 1.0.2). MAIN
resultsForty-three studies (45 data sets with 8913 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was high. In asthmatics with mild to moderate disease who were not on oral steroids a dose-response effect was present with FP for change in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF). For low doses (100 versus 200 microg/day) the weighted mean difference (WMD) was 6.29 litres/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.28 to 10.29. Comparing medium (400 to 500 microg/day) to low dose (200 microg/day) FP the WMD was 6.46 litres/min (95% CI 3.02 to 9.89); this effect was more pronounced in one trial with more severely asthmatic children. For FP 100 versus 400 to 500 microg/day the WMD was 8 litres/min (95% CI 1 to 15) and at high versus low doses (800 to 1000 versus 50 to 100 microg/d) the WMD was 22 litres/min (95% CI 15 to 29). When high and medium doses were compared there was no significant difference in the change in morning PEF: at 400 to 500 versus 800 to 1000 microg/day the WMD was 0.16 litres/min (95% CI 6.95 to 6.63). There was no dose-response effect on symptoms or rescue beta-2 agonist use. The likelihood of hoarseness and oral candidiasis was significantly greater for the higher doses (800 to 1000 microg/day). People with oral steroid-dependent asthma treated with FP (2000 microg/day) were significantly more likely to reduce oral prednisolone than those on 1000 to 1500 microg/day (Peto odds Ratio 2.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.3). The highest dose also allowed a significant reduction in daily oral prednisolone dose compared to 1000 to 1500 microg/day (WMD 2.0 mg/day, 95% CI 0.1 to 4.0 mg/day). AUTHORS'
conclusionsEffects of fluticasone are dose dependent but relatively small. At dose ratios of 1:2, there are significant differences in favour of the higher dose in morning peak flow across the low dose range. The clinical impact of these differences is open to interpretation. Patients with moderate disease achieve similar levels of asthma control on medium doses of fluticasone (400 to 500 microg/day) as they do on high doses (800 to 1000 microg/day). More work in severe asthma would help to confirm that doses of FP above 500 microg/day confer greater benefit in this subgroup than doses of around 200 microg/day. In oral corticosteroid-dependent asthmatics, reductions in prednisolone requirement may be gained with FP 2000 microg/day.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.