SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Breast stimulation for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Does Nipple Stimulation Shorten Time to Vaginal Birth in Women With Term PROM? (NIPROM Study)
Breast Stimulation vs. Low Dose Oxytocin Augmentation for Women With a History of One Prior Cesarean Section Scar and in Grand Multiparas
The Effect of Nipple Stimulation Combined With Foley Balloon Catheter on Bishop Score and Induction-to-delivery Interval: a Prospective Randomized Trial
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 168 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality appraisal of systematic reviews on methods of labour induction: a systematic review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Pooled it
- Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Breastfeeding or nipple stimulation for reducing postpartum haemorrhage in the third stage of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Antenatal breast milk expression by women with diabetes for improving infant outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Morning versus evening induction of labour for improving outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Mifepristone for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Hyaluronidase for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Homoeopathy for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Oestrogens alone or with amniotomy for cervical ripening or induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Extra-amniotic prostaglandin for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Oral prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Amniotomy alone for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000Pooled it
- Feasibility Study for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Aromatherapy Footbath for Stimulating Onset of Labor in Term Pregnant Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast stimulation has been suggested as a means of inducing labour. It is a non-medical intervention allowing women greater control over the induction process. This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using a standardised methodology.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of breast stimulation for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour in comparison with placebo/no intervention or other methods of induction of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (March 2004) and bibliographies of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Clinical trials of breast stimulation for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A strategy was developed to deal with the large volume and complexity of trial data relating to labour induction. This involved a two-stage method of data extraction. MAIN
resultsSix trials (719 women) were included. Analysis of trials comparing breast stimulation with no intervention found a significant reduction in the number of women not in labour at 72 hours (62.7% versus 93.6%, relative risk (RR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 0.74). This result was not significant in women with an unfavourable cervix. A major reduction in the rate of postpartum haemorrhage was reported (0.7% versus 6%, RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.87). No significant difference was detected in the caesarean section rate (9% versus 10%, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.12) or rates of meconium staining. There were no instances of uterine hyperstimulation. Three perinatal deaths were reported (1.8% versus 0%, RR 8.17, 95% CI 0.45 to 147.77). When comparing breast stimulation with oxytocin alone the analysis found no difference in caesarean section rates (28% versus 47%, RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.18). No difference was detected in the number of women not in labour after 72 hours (58.8% versus 25%, RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.00 to 5.54) or rates of meconium staining. There were four perinatal deaths (17.6% versus 5%, RR 3.53, 95% CI 0.40 to 30.88). AUTHORS'
conclusionsBreast stimulation appears beneficial in relation to the number of women not in labour after 72 hours, and reduced postpartum haemorrhage rates. Until safety issues have been fully evaluated it should not be used in high-risk women. Further research is required to evaluate its safety, and should seek data on postpartum haemorrhage rates, number of women not in labour at 72 hours and maternal satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.