Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16034880›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for preventing migraine and tension-type headaches.

P L Moja, C Cusi, R R Sterzi, C Canepari

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Headache (chronic tension-type).BMJ clinical evidence · 2009
    Pooled it
  6. Headache psychiatry: A structured narrative review and integrative framework.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Treatment Update of Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2017
    Review
  12. Headache (chronic tension-type).BMJ clinical evidence · 2016
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Serum oxidant and antioxidant status of patients with chronic tension-type headache: possible effects of medical treatment.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Treatment of PTSD and Chronic Daily Headache.Current treatment options in neurology · 2014
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P L MojaCentro Cochrane Italiano, Istituto Mario Negri, Via Eritrea, 62, Milano, Italy, 20157. moja@marionegri.it
C Cusi
R R Sterzi
C Canepari
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITOspedale Sant'Anna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeadache is a common medical problem. In view of recent discoveries about the role of serotonin in pain mechanisms, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been evaluated for the prevention of migraine and tension-type headaches (TTH).

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of SSRIs for preventing migraine and TTH. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE (1966-2004), EMBASE (1994-2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 4, 2003), and reference lists of retrieved articles. Headache Quarterly was hand searched from 1990 to 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials comparing SSRIs with any type of control intervention in patients of either sex, over 18 years of age, with migraine or TTH. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data (headache frequency, index, severity, and duration; use of symptomatic/analgesic medication; days off work; quality of life; mood improvement; cost-effectiveness; and adverse events) and assessed the methodological quality of trials. MAIN

resultsThirteen studies utilizing five SSRIs met the inclusion criteria (636 participants). Most of the included studies had methodological and/or reporting shortcomings; follow up rarely extended beyond 3 months. After 2 months SSRIs did not significantly lower headache index scores in patients with migraine when compared to placebo (SMD -0.14; 95% CI -0.57 to 0.30). Patients with chronic TTH treated with an SSRI had a significantly higher analgesic intake of 5 more doses per month when compared to patients treated with a tricyclic antidepressant (WMD 4.98; 95% CI 1.12 to 8.84). Tricyclics also significantly reduced headache duration by 1.26 hours per day (WMD 1.26; 95% CI 0.06 to 2.45) and marginally reduced headache indexes (SMD 0.42; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.85) when compared to SSRIs in patients with chronic TTH. When the data on adverse events were considered without regard to headache diagnostic subgroups, there were no significant differences between SSRIs and placebo for withdrawals due to adverse events (Peto OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.31 to 3.34). For minor adverse events, SSRIs were generally more tolerable than tricyclics (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.92). However, there were no differences in the number of patients withdrawing due to any reason in the SSRI and tricyclic groups (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.80). AUTHORS'

conclusionsOver 2 months of treatment, SSRIs are no more efficacious than placebo in patients with migraine. In patients with chronic TTH, SSRIs are less efficacious than tricyclic antidepressants. In comparison with SSRIs, the burden of adverse events in patients receiving tricyclics was greater. These results are based on short-term trials and may not generalise to longer-term treatment.

Indexed as

HumansMigraine DisordersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTension-Type HeadacheSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID16034880
OpenAlexW1559267862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.