Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16033780›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2005

The use of microarrays to study the anaerobic response in Arabidopsis.

Silvia Gonzali, Elena Loreti, Giacomo Novi, Alessandra Poggi, Amedeo Alpi, Pierdomenico Perata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Silvia GonzaliDepartment of Crop Plant Biology, University of Pisa, Via Mariscoglio 34, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Elena Loreti
Giacomo Novi
Alessandra Poggi
Amedeo Alpi
Pierdomenico Perata

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe use of microarrays to characterize the transcript profile of Arabidopsis under various experimental conditions is rapidly expanding. This technique provides a huge amount of expression data, requiring bioinformatics tools to allow the proposal of working hypotheses. The aim of this study was to test the usefulness of this approach to examine the anaerobic response of Arabidopsis by evaluating the reliability of microarray data sets and by interrogation of microarray databases for the expression data of a set of anoxia-inducible genes.

methodsUser-driven software tools that display large gene expression datasets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways were used. The Genevestigator software was used to explore the expression of anoxia-inducible genes throughout the life cycle of Arabidopsis as well as relative to plant organs. T-DNA tagged mutants for selected genes identified from our microarray analysis were searched in the Arabidopsis thaliana Insertion Database, looking for insertional mutants from the Salk collection. KEY

resultsThe results indicate that microarray data can provide the basis for new hypotheses in the field of plant responses to anaerobiosis and also provide knowledge for a targeted screening of Arabidopsis mutants.

conclusionsResearch on plant responses to anaerobiosis can enormously benefit from the microarray technology.

Indexed as

Oligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAnaerobiosisArabidopsisFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantHypoxiaPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesPlant Structures

Identifiers

PMID16033780
PMCPMC4247033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.