Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16032956›Full record

ArticleVital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research2005

Methodological issues in measuring health disparities.

Kenneth Keppel, Elsie Pamuk, John Lynch, Olivia Carter-Pokras, Kim Insun, Vickie Mays, Jeffrey Pearcy, Victor Schoenbach, Joel S Weissman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Child maltreatment in Canada: prevalence and gender differences among youth.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolution of income inequalities in the caries experience of 5-year-old children in Brazil between 2010 and 2023.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kenneth KeppelCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.
Elsie Pamuk
John Lynch
Olivia Carter-Pokras
Kim Insun
Vickie Mays
Jeffrey Pearcy
Victor Schoenbach
Joel S Weissman

Funding

UCLA Center for Minority Health DisparitiesP60MD000508 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAYS, VICKIE M · 2003 to 2006
$4.6M
NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD000508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis report discusses six issues that affect the measurement of disparities in health between groups in a population: Selecting a reference point from which to measure disparity. Measuring disparity in absolute or in relative terms. Measuring in terms of favorable or adverse events. Measuring in pair-wise or in summary fashion. Choosing whether to weight groups according to group size. Deciding whether to consider any inherent ordering of the groups. These issues represent choices that are made when disparities are measured.

methodsExamples are used to highlight how these choices affect specific measures of disparity.

resultsThese choices can affect the size and direction of disparities measured at a point in time and conclusions about the size and direction of changes in disparity over time. Eleven guidelines for measuring disparities are presented.

conclusionsChoices concerning the measurement of disparity should be made deliberately, recognizing that each choice will affect the results. When results are presented, the choices on which the measurements are based should be described clearly and justified appropriately.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsSocial JusticeData CollectionEthnicityFemaleHealthy People ProgramsHumansMaleUnited StatesVital Statistics

Identifiers

PMID16032956
PMCPMC3681823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.