ArticleCurrent genetics2005
Genetic structure of a population of the fungus Leptosphaeria maculans in a disease nursery of Brassica napus in Australia.
Article in Current genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microsatellite, minisatellite and mating type markers were used to determine the genetic structure of the fungus Leptosphaeria maculans within a disease nursery, where Brassica napus lines were screened for resistance to blackleg disease under high inoculum pressure. Fungal isolates were collected from pseudothecia in infected stubble and pycnidia within cotyledon lesions on seedlings within the nursery. Genetic diversity was high with gene diversity at H=0.700 across four polymorphic loci, and genotypic diversity at D=0.993. Among the 159 isolates analysed, 102 multilocus genotypes were identified. The even distribution of mating type idiomorphs MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 and gametic equilibrium within the population provided further evidence of random mating. Genetic diversity was distributed on a very fine scale in the disease nursery. The majority of genetic diversity (67%) was distributed among conidia within a lesion or among ascospores from a piece of stubble, while the remainder (33%) was distributed within lesions on seedlings or different stubble pieces. There were no among-group differences between samples from stubble and seedlings. This is consistent with the low level of genetic differentiation between the ascospore and conidia samples (F (ST)=0.017) indicating that all isolates of L. maculans from the disease nursery most likely belong to one population, and that ascospores form the primary inoculum in the disease nursery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.