Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16030222›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2005

Use of suppression-subtractive hybridization to identify genes in the Burkholderia cepacia complex that are unique to Burkholderia cenocepacia.

Steve P Bernier, Pamela A Sokol

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steve P BernierDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary Health Sciences Center, 3330 Hospital Dr. N. W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Pamela A Sokol
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have previously shown differences in virulence between species of the Burkholderia cepacia complex using the alfalfa infection model and the rat agar bead chronic infection model. Burkholderia cenocepacia strains were more virulent in these two infection models than Burkholderia multivorans and Burkholderia stabilis strains. In order to identify genes that may account for the increased virulence of B. cenocepacia, suppression-subtractive hybridization was performed between B. cenocepacia K56-2 and B. multivorans C5393 and between B. cenocepacia K56-2 and B. stabilis LMG14294. Genes identified included DNA modification/phage-related/insertion sequences and genes involved in cell membrane/surface structures, resistance, transport, metabolism, regulation, secretion systems, as well as genes of unknown function. Several of these genes were present in the ET12 lineage of B. cenocepacia but not in other members of the B. cepacia complex. Virulence studies in a chronic lung infection model determined that the hypothetical YfjI protein, which is unique to the ET12 clone, contributes to lung pathology. Other genes specific to B. cenocepacia and/or the ET12 lineage were shown to play a role in biofilm formation and swarming or swimming motility.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialAnimalsBurkholderiaBurkholderia cepaciaBurkholderia InfectionsDisease Models, AnimalGenomic LibraryNucleic Acid HybridizationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpecies SpecificityVirulence

Identifiers

PMID16030222
PMCPMC1196026
OpenAlexW2109039917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.