Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16025188›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction2006

Incontinence-specific quality of life measures used in trials of treatments for female urinary incontinence: a systematic review.

Sue Ross, Dana Soroka, Amalia Karahalios, Cathryn M A Glazener, E Jean C Hay-Smith, Harold P Drutz

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Self-reported pad use per day reflects patient quality of life after pubovaginal sling surgery.International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2009
    Article
  17. Portuguese validation of the Urinary Incontinence-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument: I-QOL.International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2009
    Article
  18. Goal achievement as a patient-generated outcome measure for stress urinary incontinence.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2009
    Article
  19. Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL): translation and validation study of the Iranian version.International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2009
    Article
  20. EuroQol EQ-5D and condition-specific measures of health outcome in women with urinary incontinence: reliability, validity and responsiveness.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sue RossDepartment of Obstetrics, Family Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Canada. sue.ross@calgaryhealthregion.ca
Dana Soroka
Amalia Karahalios
Cathryn M A Glazener
E Jean C Hay-Smith
Harold P Drutz

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review examined the use of incontinence-specific quality of life (QOL) measures in clinical trials of female incontinence treatments, and systematically evaluated their quality using a standard checklist. Of 61 trials included in the review, 58 (95.1%) used an incontinence-specific QOL measure. The most commonly used were IIQ (19 papers), I-QoL (12 papers) and UDI (9 papers). Eleven papers (18.0%) used measures which were not referenced or were developed specifically for the study. The eight QOL measures identified had good clinical face validity and measurement properties. We advise researchers to evaluate carefully the needs of their specific study, and select the QOL measure that is most appropriate in terms of validity, utility and relevance, and discourage the development of new measures. Until better evidence is available on the validity and comparability of measures, we recommend that researchers consider using IIQ or I-QOL with or without UDI in trials of incontinence treatments.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.