Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16024805›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2005

Disruption of mechanisms that prevent rereplication triggers a DNA damage response.

Vincent Archambault, Amy E Ikui, Benjamin J Drapkin, Frederick R Cross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advances in Cancer Treatment by Targeting the Neddylation Pathway.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Large-scale heterochromatin remodeling linked to overreplication-associated DNA damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Multiple mechanisms contribute to double-strand break repair at rereplication forks in Drosophila follicle cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Plasma membrane/cell wall perturbation activates a novel cell cycle checkpoint during G1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vincent ArchambaultThe Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., Box 237, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Amy E Ikui
Benjamin J Drapkin
Frederick R Cross

Funding

SPECIFICITY OF CYCLIN FUNCTION AT CELL CYCLE INITIATIONR01GM047238 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CROSS, FREDERICK R. · 1993 to 2010
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotes replicate DNA once and only once per cell cycle due to multiple, partially overlapping mechanisms efficiently preventing reinitiation. The consequences of reinitiation are unknown. Here we show that the induction of rereplication by mutations in components of the prereplicative complex (origin recognition complex [ORC], Cdc6, and minichromosome maintenance proteins) causes a cell cycle arrest with activated Rad53, a large-budded morphology, and an undivided nucleus. Combining a mutation disrupting the Clb5-Orc6 interaction (ORC6-rxl) and a mutation stabilizing Cdc6 (CDC6(Delta)NT) causes a cell cycle delay with a similar phenotype, although this background is only partially compromised for rereplication control and does not exhibit overreplication detectable by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. We conducted a systematic screen that identified genetic requirements for the viability of these cells. ORC6-rxl CDC6(Delta)NT cells depend heavily on genes required for the DNA damage response and for double-strand-break repair by homologous recombination. Our results implicate an Mre11-Mec1-dependent pathway in limiting the extent of rereplication.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA ReplicationEndodeoxyribonucleasesExodeoxyribonucleasesGenes, ReporterIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomycetalesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2Ddc1 protein, S cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesExodeoxyribonucleasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLCD1 protein, S cerevisiaeMEC1 protein, S cerevisiaeMRC1 protein, S cerevisiaeMRE11 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRAD17 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD50 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD53 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTOF1 protein, S cerevisiaeXRS2 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID16024805
PMCPMC1190345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.