Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16022774›Full record

ReviewEmerging infectious diseases2005

SARS vaccine development.

Shibo Jiang, Yuxian He, Shuwen Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emerging infectious diseases, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A comparison between SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV2: an update on current COVID-19 vaccines.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Moving beyond Titers.Vaccines · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Antiviral effects of azithromycin: A narrative review.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shibo JiangNew York Blood Center, New York, New York 10021, USA. SJiang@NYBloodcenter.org
Yuxian He
Shuwen Liu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing effective and safe vaccines is urgently needed to prevent infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV). The inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine may be the first one available for clinical use because it is easy to generate; however, safety is the main concern. The spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV is the major inducer of neutralizing antibodies, and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) in the S1 subunit of S protein contains multiple conformational neutralizing epitopes. This suggests that recombinant proteins containing RBD and vectors encoding the RBD sequence can be used to develop safe and effective SARS vaccines.

Indexed as

Viral VaccinesEpitopesHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccines, InactivatedViral Envelope ProteinsEpitopesMembrane GlycoproteinsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike glycoprotein, SARS-CoVspike protein, mouse hepatitis virusVaccines, InactivatedViral Envelope ProteinsViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID16022774
PMCPMC3371787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.