Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16021524›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2005

Comparison of F-actin fluorescent labeling methods in pollen tubes of Lilium davidii.

Li Wang, Yi-Min Liu, Yan Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li WangState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100094, PR China.
Yi-Min Liu
Yan Li
China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence labeling of F-actin in pollen tubes by various methods has produced inconsistent results in the literature. Here, we report that EGTA, which was always used in fixative buffers in the past and thought to help cytoskeleton stabilization, can significantly affect F-actin distribution and lead to the formation of thick F-actin bundles at the tip of the pollen tube. We also found that vacuum-infiltration for the first 5 min during pollen tube fixation can better preserve normal cytoplasm structure and F-actin distribution. In contrast, m-maleimidobenzoic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (MBS) treatment before chemical fixation resulted in a shortening of the free zone of thick F-actin bundles in the pollen tube tip. Taken together, our results suggest that exclusion of EGTA and MBS from the fixative buffer, in combination with vacuum-infiltration in the first 5 min of fixation, can improve F-actin fluorescence labeling in pollen tubes of Lilium davidii.

Indexed as

ActinsBuffersEgtazic AcidFlowersFluorescent DyesLiliumMicroscopy, ConfocalSuccinimidesTissue FixationActinsBuffersEgtazic AcidFluorescent Dyesm-maleimidobenzoyl-N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide esterSuccinimides

Identifiers

PMID16021524
OpenAlexW1967805456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.