Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16020858›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005

Efficacy of antidepressants in adults.

Joanna Moncrieff, Irving Kirsch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Efficacy of antidepressants and benzodiazepines in minor depression: systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2011
    Pooled it
  10. Efficacy of antimanic treatments: meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2011
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Low doses of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) increase reward-related brain activity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joanna MoncrieffDepartment of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, London W1N 8AA. j.moncrieff@ucl.ac.uk
Irving Kirsch

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsClinical Trials as TopicDepressive DisorderHumansTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID16020858
PMCPMC558707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.