Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16020794›Full record

ArticleGenetics2005

Multiple signatures of positive selection downstream of notch on the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster.

Vanessa Bauer DuMont, Charles F Aquadro

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Population Genomics on the Fly: Recent Advances in Drosophila.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  5. Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges fromPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  6. Genetic hitchhiking versus background selection: the controversy and its implications.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2010
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tracking footprints of maize domestication and evidence for a massive selective sweep on chromosome 10.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vanessa Bauer DuMontDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Charles F Aquadro
Cornell University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR POPULATION GENETICS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTERR01GM036431 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI AQUADRO, CHARLES F · 1986 to 2010
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM36431NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify genomic regions affected by the rapid fixation of beneficial mutations (selective sweeps), we performed a scan of microsatellite variability across the Notch locus region of Drosophila melanogaster. Nine microsatellites spanning 60 kb of the X chromosome were surveyed for variation in one African and three non-African populations of this species. The microsatellites identified an approximately 14-kb window for which we observed relatively low levels of variability and/or a skew in the frequency spectrum toward rare alleles, patterns predicted at regions linked to a selective sweep. DNA sequence polymorphism data were subsequently collected within this 14-kb region for three of the D. melanogaster populations. The sequence data strongly support the initial microsatellite findings; in the non-African populations there is evidence of a recent selective sweep downstream of the Notch locus near or within the open reading frames CG18508 and Fcp3C. In addition, we observe a significant McDonald-Kreitman test result suggesting too many amino acid fixations species wide, presumably due to positive selection, at the unannotated open reading frame CG18508. Thus, we observe within this small genomic region evidence for both recent (skew toward rare alleles in non-African populations) and recurring (amino acid evolution at CG18508) episodes of positive selection.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationPolymorphism, GeneticSelection, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene ComponentsLikelihood FunctionsMicrosatellite RepeatsMolecular Sequence DataMutationReceptors, NotchSequence Analysis, DNAX ChromosomeDrosophila ProteinsN protein, DrosophilaReceptors, Notch

Identifiers

PMID16020794
PMCPMC1456778
OpenAlexW2164707706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.