Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16014926›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2005

Marked variation in response of consensus binding elements for the Rta protein of Epstein-Barr virus.

Lee-Wen Chen, Pey-Jium Chang, Henri-Jacques Delecluse, George Miller

Open access · greenAbstract readAddressComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 5-hydroxymethylation of the EBV genome regulates the latent to lytic switch.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lee-Wen ChenDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT , USA.
Pey-Jium Chang
Henri-Jacques Delecluse
George Miller
German Cancer Research Center · DEYale University · US

Funding

VIRAL SMALL RNPS--ROLES IN CELL TRANSFORMATIONP01CA016038 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DIMAIO, DANIEL C. · 1985 to 2020
$25.6M
STUDIES OF EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUSR37CA012055 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, I. GEORGE · 1989 to 2012
$4.4M
AIDS LYMPHOMA--HARBORING TWO GAMMA HERPESVIRUSESR01CA070036 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, I. GEORGE · 1995 to 2003
$1.4M
STUDIES OF EPSTEIN-BARR VIRUSR01CA012055 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, I. GEORGE · 1985 to 2002
$737k
NCI NIH HHS CA12055NCI NIH HHS CA16038NCI NIH HHS CA70036NCI NIH HHS P01 CA016038NCI NIH HHS R01 CA012055NCI NIH HHS R01 CA070036NCI NIH HHS R37 CA012055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The R transactivator (Rta) protein activates Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lytic-cycle genes by several distinct mechanisms that include direct binding to viral promoters, synergy with BamHI Z EBV replication activator (ZEBRA), and activation of cellular signaling pathways. In the direct and synergistic mechanisms of action, Rta binds to specific DNA sequences that are present in the promoters of responsive genes. It has been difficult to demonstrate the capacity of Rta expressed in mammalian cells to bind DNA in vitro in order to study the relative affinities of Rta binding elements. We discovered that a short C-terminal region of Rta inhibits the ability of Rta to bind DNA in vitro. C-terminally truncated versions of Rta bind DNA efficiently and thus facilitate a comparison of consensus Rta binding elements (CRBEs) found in promoters of five Rta-responsive genes: BMLF1, BHLF1, BMRF1, BaRF1, and BLRF2. All CRBEs in the promoters of the five genes conform to the proposed recognition sequence GNCCN9GGNG, where N is any nucleotide and N9 represents a sequence of nine nucleotides. Nonetheless, CRBEs varied markedly in their abilities to bind Rta in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Not all CRBEs bound or responded to Rta. Binding affinities of the CRBEs and the capacity to be activated by Rta in reporter assays were strongly correlated. The CRBEs from the BMLF1 and BHLF1 promoters conferred the greatest response. The response of the BMRF1, BaRF1, and BLRF2 CRBEs was less robust. By creation of chimeras, inversions, and point mutations, differences in binding affinities and transcriptional activation levels could be attributed to N9 sequence variation. The length of N9 was also critical for a maximal response. In Raji and BZLF1-knockout cells, the mRNAs of the five Rta-responsive lytic-cycle genes differed dramatically in kinetics of expression, abundance, and synergistic responses to ZEBRA and Rta. Affinities of Rta response elements for Rta are likely to play an important role in temporal regulation and the level of lytic-cycle EBV gene expression.

Indexed as

Consensus SequenceGenetic VariationBinding SitesCell LineDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ViralHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansImmediate-Early ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticTrans-ActivatorsViral ProteinsVirus ReplicationBRLF1 protein, Human herpesvirus 4DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, ViralImmediate-Early ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16014926
PMCPMC1181578
OpenAlexW2083680540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.