Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16014677›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2006

Markov model into the cost-utility over five years of etanercept and infliximab compared with usual care in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis.

A Boonen, D van der Heijde, J L Severens, A Boendermaker, R Landewé, J Braun, J Brandt, J Sieper, Sj van der Linden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A noticeable difference? Productivity costs related to paid and unpaid work in economic evaluations on expensive drugs.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Economic considerations of the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.The American journal of the medical sciences · 2012
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

A BoonenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands. aboo@sint.azm.nl
D van der Heijde
J L Severens
A Boendermaker
R Landewé
J Braun
J Brandt
J Sieper
Sj van der Linden
Maastricht University · NLFranklin University · USFreie Universität Berlin · DEMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the incremental cost-utility of etanercept and infliximab compared with usual care in active ankylosing spondylitis.

methodsA Markov model over five years with cycle times of three months was computed. Patients included all had active disease, defined as Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) >or=4 and could reach low disease activity, defined as BASDAI <4. Non-response to tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors was always followed by cessation of treatment. Response to TNFalpha inhibitors could be followed at any time by either relapse to BASDAI >or=4, leading to cessation of treatment, or toxicity, leading to cessation of treatment if major. Probabilities for efficacy, relapse, and toxicity were derived from two European randomised controlled trials. Utilities and costs assigned to the BASDAI disease states were derived from a two year observational Dutch cohort. In sensitivity analyses probabilities of effectiveness, toxicity, costs, and utilities were varied.

resultsOver five years the total quality adjusted life years varied from 2.57 to 2.89 for usual care, compared with 3.13 to 3.42 and 3.07 to 3.35 for etanercept or infliximab. Cumulative costs were between 49,555 to 69,982 for usual care compared with 59,574 to 91,183 or 28,3330 to 106,775 for etanercept and infliximab. This resulted in incremental cost-utility ratios varying between 42,914 and 123,761 per QALY for etanercept compared with usual care and 67,207 to 237,010 for infliximab. The model was sensitive to drug prices.

conclusionEtanercept and infliximab have large clinical effects in ankylosing spondylitis. The present model suggests the high drug costs restricts efficient use in all patients who have a BASDAI >4. The validity of the model is limited by insufficient insight in the natural course of the disease and long term effectiveness and toxicity of TNFalpha inhibitors.

Indexed as

Markov ChainsModels, EconomicAcute DiseaseAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic AgentsCohort StudiesDrug CostsEtanerceptFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GInfliximabMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareAntibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic AgentsEtanerceptImmunoglobulin GInfliximabReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor

Identifiers

PMID16014677
PMCPMC1798006
OpenAlexW2157008349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.