Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16012868›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2005

[Treating depressive disorders with continuation electroconvulsive therapy].

A Sartorius, F A Henn

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Electroconvulsive therapy and its different indications.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A SartoriusZentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, J5, Mannheim. sartorius@web.de
F A Henn
Central Institute of Mental Health · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is undergoing a renaissance in psychiatry: it is now considered a first-line therapy for treating psychotic depression or other disorders with severe depressive symptoms. Surprisingly, ECT is most commonly not used as continuation therapy after acute remission. With rare exceptions, antidepressive medication is chosen for this purpose. The use of continuation ECT (cECT) and subsequent maintenance ECT (mECT) is not or just marginally mentioned in practice guidelines. In this article, we suggest guidelines for cECT, taking therapy recommendations and recent studies into account. Particularly, indication, management, comedication and comorbidity, side effects, and costs are examined. Today, cECT is underindicated as a result of assumed problems, fears, and stigmas. We would therefore recommend broader use of this proven treatment tool for keeping major depression in remission.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicDepressive DisorderElectroconvulsive TherapyGermanyHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID16012868
OpenAlexW2599972329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.