Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16010559›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology international2006

Magnetic resonance imaging guided corticosteroid injection of sacroiliac joints in patients with spondylarthropathy. Are multiple injections more beneficial?

I Günaydin, P L Pereira, J Fritz, C König, I Kötter

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology international, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. La Tunisie medicale · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment of the painful sacroiliac joint.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2008
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I GünaydinDepartment of Internal Medicine II (Hematology, Oncology, Immunology and Rheumatology), University Hospital, Eberhard-Karls-University, Otfried-Müller-Strasse 10, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. ilhan.guenaydin@med.uni-tuebingen.de
P L Pereira
J Fritz
C König
I Kötter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficacy of a second magnetic resonance (MR) imaging guided corticosteroid injection of inflamed sacroiliac joints (SIJ) in patients with spondylarthropathy. Thirty-one patients received 50 injections in an outpatient basis. Fifteen of 31 patients who relapsed or were non-responders received a second injection. All had MR guided injection of 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide into SIJ using an open 0.2 Tesla unit. Twenty of 31 patients after the first injection, and 9 of 15 patients after the second injection reported subjective improvement, which lasted for a mean of 8.7+/-10.9 and 16.1+/-15.8 months for each group. Subchondral bone marrow edema resolved in 15 of 20 patients who reported subjective improvement, after the first injection. No complications occurred. MR guided steroid injection of SIJ is effective and safe. Since there is no exposure to radiation it could be performed many times. Repeated injections seem to be beneficial for primary non-responders and patients who relapsed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsChildDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementSacroiliac JointSpondylarthropathiesTreatment OutcomeTriamcinolone AcetonideAnti-Inflammatory AgentsTriamcinolone Acetonide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.