Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16010001›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2005

It's all GO for plant scientists.

Jennifer I Clark, Cath Brooksbank, Jane Lomax

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. miRNA-based drought regulation in wheat.Functional & integrative genomics · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Application of genetic/genomic approaches to allergic disorders.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2010
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gramene: a bird's eye view of cereal genomes.Nucleic acids research · 2006
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer I ClarkEMBL-EBI Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, United Kingdom. jclark@ebi.ac.uk
Cath Brooksbank
Jane Lomax

Funding

NHGRI NIH HHS HG02273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Gene Ontology project (http://www.geneontology.org/) produces structured, controlled vocabularies and gene product annotations. Gene products are classified according to the cellular locations and biological process in which they act, and the molecular functions that they carry out. We annotate gene products from a broad range of model species and provide support for those groups that wish to contribute annotation of further model species. The Gene Ontology facilitates the exchange of information between groups of scientists studying similar processes in different model organisms, and so provides a broad range of opportunities for plant scientists.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantGenome, PlantGeneticsPlants

Identifiers

PMID16010001
PMCPMC1176400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.