Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16008835›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2005

Does alendronate reduce the risk of fracture in men? A meta-analysis incorporating prior knowledge of anti-fracture efficacy in women.

Anna M Sawka, Alexandra Papaioannou, Jonathan D Adachi, Amiram Gafni, David A Hanley, Lehana Thabane

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of bisphosphonates against osteoporosis in adult men: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2010
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. The osteoporosis care gap in men with fragility fractures: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2008
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Management of Osteoporosis in Men: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening Strategies for Men.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Treatment of primary osteoporosis in men.Clinical interventions in aging · 2015
    Review
  16. Cost-effectiveness of training rural providers to identify and treat patients at risk for fragility fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. The potential economic benefits of improved postfracture care: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a fracture liaison service in the US health-care system.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2014
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Idiopathic osteoporosis in men.Current osteoporosis reports · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna M SawkaDepartment of Medicine, St, Joseph's Healthcare and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. sawkaam@yahoo.com
Alexandra Papaioannou
Jonathan D Adachi
Amiram Gafni
David A Hanley
Lehana Thabane
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

CIHR 73426-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlendronate has been found to reduce the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women as demonstrated in multiple randomized controlled trials enrolling thousands of women. Yet there is a paucity of such randomized controlled trials in osteoporotic men. Our objective was to systematically review the anti-fracture efficacy of alendronate in men with low bone mass or with a history of prevalent fracture(s) and incorporate prior knowledge of alendronate efficacy in women in the analysis.

methodsWe examined randomized controlled trials in men comparing the anti-fracture efficacy of alendronate to placebo or calcium or vitamin D, or any combination of these. Studies of men with secondary causes of osteoporosis other than hypogonadism were excluded. We searched the following electronic databases (without language restrictions) for potentially relevant citations: Medline, Medline in Process (1966-May 24/2004), and Embase (1996-2004). We also contacted the manufacturer of the drug in search of other relevant trials. Two reviewers independently identified two trials (including 375 men), which met all inclusion criteria. Data were abstracted by one reviewer and checked by another. Results of the male trials were pooled using Bayesian random effects models, incorporating prior information of anti-fracture efficacy from meta-analyses of women.

resultsThe odds ratios of incident fractures in men (with 95% credibility intervals) with alendronate (10 mg daily) were: vertebral fractures, 0.44 (0.23, 0.83) and non-vertebral fractures, 0.60 (0.29, 1.44).

conclusionIn conclusion, alendronate decreases the risk of vertebral fractures in men at risk. There is currently insufficient evidence of a statistically significant reduction of non-vertebral fractures, but the paucity of trials in men limit the statistical power to detect such an effect.

Indexed as

Sex FactorsAdultAgedAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsFemaleFractures, BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskRisk Reduction BehaviorSpinal FracturesAlendronateBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID16008835
PMCPMC1182376
OpenAlexW1808012493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.