Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2005
Scaling of muscle power to body size: the effect of stretch-shortening cycle.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percentile-Based Normative Standards for Strength Assessment Beyond Linear Bodyweight Multipliers in Competitive Powerlifters.Sports medicine - open · 2026Article
- Body-mass normalization of powerlifting performance: development and independent validation of sex- and age-specific regression-residual scores.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Sex-specific allometric modeling and regression-residual normalization for size-adjusted strength assessment.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Isokinetic leg muscle strength relationship to dynamic balance reflects gymnast-specific differences in adolescent females.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Body size and countermovement depth confound relationship between muscle power output and jumping performance.Human movement science · 2014Article
- Jump training with different loads: effects on jumping performance and power output.European journal of applied physiology · 2013Article
- On self-propagating methodological flaws in performance normalization for strength and power sports.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2013Review
- Evaluation of Margaria staircase test: the effect of body size.European journal of applied physiology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study investigates the relationship between muscle power recorded in vertical jumps and body size, and explores possible differences in this relationship between the concentric (CON) and stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) muscle action. Physical education students (N = 159) were tested with the performance of various CON and SSC maximum vertical jumps. The relationship between muscle power (P) and body size (S) was assessed by P=aS(b) where a and b were the constant multiplayer and scaling exponent, respectively. With respect to body mass and fat-free mass, the scaling exponents b for mean muscle power (calculated from the ground reaction force) in CON and SSC jumps were within the range 0.69-0.82 and 0.90-1.15, respectively. With respect to body height, the scaling exponent was higher (0.76-0.97 and 1.23-1.79, respectively), but the observed relationship proved to be relatively weak. However, when jump height was used as an index of muscle power, the same exponents were close to zero (suggesting no relationship with any of the indices of body size) in all the jumps except an SSC based hopping jump that demonstrated a weak but positive relation to body size. In conclusion, muscle power could scale to body size at a higher rate than predicted by geometric similarity (i.e. b = 0.67), while larger individuals could gain more when switching from CON to SSC muscle action. These findings could be based on a non-geometric scaling of transversal with respect to longitudinal dimensions and/or on different scaling rates of muscles and tendons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16007449What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.