Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16004853›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2005

Treatment of vascular dementia: evidence from epidemiologic studies.

Hee-Joon Bae, Dilip K Pandey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hee-Joon BaeCenter for Stroke Research, 1645 West Jackson, Suite 400, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Dilip K Pandey
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article discusses the most relevant recent evidence on the prevention and treatment of vascular dementia from epidemiologic studies. Vascular dementia is the most common form of dementia after Alzheimer's disease and remains the only one that is preventable, although most of our knowledge about primary and secondary prevention of vascular dementia comes from direct extrapolation from works in stroke. Furthermore, at present there are no approved therapeutic agents for the treatment of vascular dementia. Recently, however, a number of reasonable studies on vascular dementia have been available. It is clear that rigorous control of vascular risk factors is important in primary and secondary prevention of vascular dementia, and perhaps in ameliorating its mild form. A rational therapeutic approach to the treatment of vascular dementia should be based on an understanding of its broad clinical spectrum and the diverse causes that may be responsive to currently available treatments.

Identifiers

PMID16004853
OpenAlexW1971967451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.