ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2005
Fuzzy logic and continuous cellular automata in warfarin dosing of stroke patients.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practice guidelines and clinical risk assessment models: is it time to reform?BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2011Article
- Fuzzy logic: A "simple" solution for complexities in neurosciences?Surgical neurology international · 2011Article
- Measurable prediction for the single patient and the results of large double blind controlled randomized trials.PloS one · 2008Article
- EC-IC bypass: the failure of a clinical trial? Applicability to PFO closure trials.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2007Article
- How artificial intelligence tools can be used to assess individual patient risk in cardiovascular disease: problems with the current methods.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2006Article
- Medical concepts related to individual risk are better explained with "plausibility" rather than "probability".BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
"Evidence-based" recommendations for warfarin prescription in patients with history of ischemic stroke limit its use to prevention of stroke due to atrial fibrillation. Warfarin is also prescribed by the authors to prevent thrombosis in stroke patients with thrombophilia and potential cardiac or arterial source for thromboembolism. These potential conditions, in the face of thrombophilia, include, but may not be limited to, dilated cardiomyopathy, decreased left ventricular function, atrial septal aneurysm with or without patent foramen ovale (PFO), PFO with evidence of pelvic or lower extremity deep venous thrombosis or with clear thrombophilia, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast, intracardiac or intra-arterial thrombus, intra-aortic arch thrombus, high degree of stenosis of large- and medium-sized cerebrovascular arteries, and arterial dissection. Commonly diagnosed thrombophilic states in our population currently include protein S or C deficiency, antiphospholipid antibodies, and less commonly ATIII deficiency, factor V Leiden mutation, G20210A PT mutation, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 mutation. Thrombophilic states often occur in combination. The occurrence of combined arterial, cardiac, and thrombophilic sources of thromboembolism poignantly describes the complexity of causation of ischemic stroke in any one patient. Our practice of treating the complex interaction of thromboembolic sources is based on scientific evidence, which is not arbitrarily limited to probability-based statistics. Warfarin is well known in the clinical setting to interact with many different contextual factors of the individual patient, making its dosing and response unique to that patient. We have shown why the indications for warfarin use and its dosing cannot be directly extrapolated to the individual patient from the results of large, double-blind, randomized trials. In practice, the unique patient and his or her context must be considered by the expert physician who makes the therapeutic decision. The context includes, but is not limited to, known pathologies that contribute to thrombus formation according to the accepted pathophysiologic model of thrombosis based on Virchow's triad of altered flow, endothelium, and blood components.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.