Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16003502›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2005

Molecular cytogenetics in haematological malignancy: current technology and future prospects.

Lyndal Kearney, Sharon W Horsley

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Overview on Aneuploidy in Childhood B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cytogenetic Profile andClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. High Throughput FISH Analysis: A New, Sensitive Option For Evaluation of Hematological Malignancies.Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Molecular cytogenetics in translational oncology: when chromosomes meet genomics.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2008
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lyndal KearneySection of Haemato-Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK. Lyndal.Kearney@icr.ac.uk
Sharon W Horsley
Institute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytogenetics has played a pivotal role in haematological malignancy, both as an aid to diagnosis and in identifying recurrent chromosomal rearrangements, an essential prerequisite to identifying genes involved in leukaemia and lymphoma pathogenesis. In the late 1980s, a series of technologies based around fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) revolutionised the field. Interphase FISH, multiplex-FISH (M-FISH, SKY) and comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) have emerged as the most significant of these. More recently, microarray technologies have come to prominence. In the acute leukaemias, the finding of characteristic gene expression signatures corresponding to biological subgroups has heralded gene expression profiling as a possible future alternative to current cytogenetic and morphological methods for diagnosis. In the lymphomas, high-resolution array CGH has successfully identified new regions of deletion and amplification, providing the prospect of disease-specific arrays.

Indexed as

ChildCytogenetic AnalysisHematologic NeoplasmsHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNucleic Acid HybridizationPolyploidyPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

Identifiers

PMID16003502
OpenAlexW2064651369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.