Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16003374›Full record

ReviewNature biotechnology2005

New sources of pancreatic beta-cells.

Susan Bonner-Weir, Gordon C Weir

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature biotechnology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed
37.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 390 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Reprogramming Cells to Make Insulin.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan Bonner-WeirSection of Islet Transplantation and Cell Biology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, One Joslin Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. susan.bonner-weir@joslin.harvard.edu
Gordon C Weir
Harvard University · USJoslin Diabetes Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two major initiatives are under way to correct the beta-cell deficit of diabetes: one would generate beta-cells ex vivo that are suitable for transplantation, and the second would stimulate regeneration of beta-cells in the pancreas. Studies of ex vivo expansion suggest that beta-cells have a potential for dedifferentiation, expansion, and redifferentiation. Work with mouse and human embryonic stem (ES) cells has not yet produced cells with the phenotype of true beta-cells, but there has been recent progress in directing ES cells to endoderm. Putative islet stem/progenitor cells have been identified in mouse pancreas, and formation of new beta-cells from duct, acinar and liver cells is an active area of investigation. Peptides, including glucagon-like peptide-1/exendin-4 and the combination of epidermal growth factor and gastrin, can stimulate regeneration of beta-cells in vivo. Recent progress in the search for new sources of beta-cells has opened promising new opportunities and spawned clinical trials.

Indexed as

RegenerationCell DifferentiationDiabetes MellitusEmbryo, MammalianEmbryo, NonmammalianEpidermal Growth FactorExenatideGastrinsGlucagonGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Islets of LangerhansPancreasPeptide FragmentsPeptidesProtein PrecursorsStem CellsEpidermal Growth FactorExenatideGastrinsGlucagonGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Peptide FragmentsPeptidesProtein PrecursorsVenoms

Identifiers

PMID16003374
OpenAlexW1540138335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.