Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16003340›Full record

ReviewGene therapy2005

Gene therapy progress and prospects: development of improved lentiviral and retroviral vectors--design, biosafety, and production.

P L Sinn, S L Sauter, P B McCray

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gene therapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 320 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Overview of the DREADDs chemogenetics and the patent landscape of their actuators.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. HIV-based lentiviral vectors: origin and sequence differences.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P L SinnProgram in Gene Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
S L Sauter
P B McCray
University of Iowa · USVirogenomics BioDevelopment (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replication defective vectors derived from simple retroviruses or the more complex genomes of lentiviruses continue to offer the advantages of long-term expression, cell and tissue specific tropism, and large packaging capacity for the delivery of therapeutic genes. The occurrence of adverse events caused by insertional mutagenesis in three patients in a gene therapy trial for X-linked SCID emphasizes the potential for problems in translating this approach to the clinic. Several genome-wide studies of retroviral integration are now providing novel insights into the integration site preferences of different vector classes. We review recent developments in vector design, integration, biosafety, and production.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansLentivirusMutagenesis, InsertionalRetroviridae

Identifiers

PMID16003340
OpenAlexW2010303814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.