Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16002886›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005

Five futures for academic medicine: the ICRAM scenarios.

Jocalyn Clark

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Journal editors and academic medicine.Croatian medical journal · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Developing a research skill set.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. How to attract, retain and nurture young academic clinicians.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Open letter to the leader of academic medicine.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Article
  13. Developing critical mass and growing our own academics.Archives of disease in childhood · 2006
    Article
  14. British academic ophthalmology in crisis.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2006
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jocalyn ClarkBMJ, London WC1H 9JR. jclark@bmj.com

Funding

Medical Research Council G84/6404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalForecastingBiomedical ResearchInternational CooperationInterprofessional RelationsPrivate SectorProfessional-Patient Relations

Identifiers

PMID16002886
PMCPMC558621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.