Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16001974›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2005

Global gene expression analysis in time series following N-acetyl L-cysteine induced epithelial differentiation of human normal and cancer cells in vitro.

Anna C Gustafsson, Ilya Kupershmidt, Esther Edlundh-Rose, Giulia Greco, Annalucia Serafino, Eva K Krasnowska, Thomas Lundeberg, Luisa Bracci-Laudiero, Maria-Concetta Romano, Tiziana Parasassi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Using genomics to understand intestinal biology.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna C GustafssonDepartment of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology, AlbaNova University Center, Roslagstullsbacken 21, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. annag@kth.se
Ilya Kupershmidt
Esther Edlundh-Rose
Giulia Greco
Annalucia Serafino
Eva K Krasnowska
Thomas Lundeberg
Luisa Bracci-Laudiero
Maria-Concetta Romano
Tiziana Parasassi
Joakim Lundeberg
Institute of Neurobiology and Molecular Medicine · ITAlbaNova · SEKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer prevention trials using different types of antioxidant supplements have been carried out at several occasions and one of the investigated compounds has been the antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). Studies at the cellular level have previously demonstrated that a single supplementation of NAC induces a ten-fold more rapid differentiation in normal primary human keratinocytes as well as a reversion of a colon carcinoma cell line from neoplastic proliferation to apical-basolateral differentiation. The investigated cells showed an early change in the organization of the cytoskeleton, several newly established adherens junctions with E-cadherin/beta-catenin complexes and increased focal adhesions, all features characterizing the differentiation process.

methodsIn order to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the proliferation arrest and accelerated differentiation induced by NAC treatment of NHEK and Caco-2 cells in vitro, we performed global gene expression analysis of NAC treated cells in a time series (1, 12 and 24 hours post NAC treatment) using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Genome U95Av2 chip, which contains approximately 12,000 previously characterized sequences. The treated samples were compared to the corresponding untreated culture at the same time point.

resultsMicroarray data analysis revealed an increasing number of differentially expressed transcripts over time upon NAC treatment. The early response (1 hour) was transient, while a constitutive trend was commonly found among genes differentially regulated at later time points (12 and 24 hours). Connections to the induction of differentiation and inhibition of growth were identified for a majority of up- and down-regulated genes. All of the observed transcriptional changes, except for seven genes, were unique to either cell line. Only one gene, ID-1, was mutually regulated at 1 hour post treatment and might represent a common mediator of early NAC action. The detection of several genes that previously have been identified as stimulated or repressed during the differentiation of NHEK and Caco-2 provided validation of results. In addition, real-time kinetic PCR analysis of selected genes also verified the differential regulation as identified by the microarray platform.

conclusionNAC induces a limited and transient early response followed by a more consistent and extensively different expression at later time points in both the normal and cancer cell lines investigated. The responses are largely related to inhibition of proliferation and stimulation of differentiation in both cell types but are almost completely lineage specific. ID-1 is indicated as an early mediator of NAC action.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAcetylcysteineAntioxidantsCadherinsCell DifferentiationCell LineCell LineageCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCytoskeletonDown-RegulationEpitheliumGenome, HumanHumansKeratinocytesAcetylcysteineAntioxidantsCadherins

Identifiers

PMID16001974
PMCPMC1182358
OpenAlexW1825436873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.