ArticleEndocrine pathology2005
Pathological assessment of pancreatic endocrine tumors for metastatic potential and clinical prognosis.
Article in Endocrine pathology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mixed ductal-acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas: A case report.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2019Article
- Silencing of UCHL1 by CpG promoter hyper-methylation is associated with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumors.Annals of surgical oncology · 2014Article
- Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas: clinical and cytomorphologic characteristics.Korean journal of pathology · 2013Article
- Mixed acinar-endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas with intraductal growth into the main pancreatic duct: Report of a case.Surgery today · 2010Article
- Predicting prognosis in gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: an overview and the value of Ki-67 immunostaining.Endocrine pathology · 2008Review
- Endocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas: grading, tumor size and proliferation index do not predict malignant behavior.Diagnostic pathology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic significance of several pathological factors (tumor size, mitotic index, Ki-67 labeling index, and vascular invasion) and expression of exocrine markers (CA19-9, CEA, AFP, and trypsin) in pancreatic endocrine tumors was studied. A total of 20 specimens of metastasizing (n = 10) and non-metastasizing (n = 10) tumors were subjected to histological and immunohistochemical examination. The metastasizing tumors showed significantly larger size, higher Ki-67 labeling index, increased number of mitotic cells, and more frequent vascular invasion in comparison with the non-metastasizing tumors. It was difficult to determine the effect of individual factors on clinical outcome because of slow disease progression in almost all cases. Numerous mitotic cells and widespread necrosis, however, were thought to indicate a poor prognosis, and tumors with these characteristics were regarded as high-grade malignant endocrine carcinomas. In one case, one-third of the tumor tissue comprised trypsin-positive cells, the outcome was comparatively poor, and the behavior of the tumor resembled that of mixed acinar-endocrine carcinoma. A simple multifactorial approach may be effective for the identification of tumors at increased risk of metastasis, but it remains difficult to determine clinical prognosis. It is essential to at least distinguish high-grade endocrine carcinomas from the more common endocrine tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16000844What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.