Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16000817›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2005

Differential gene expression for investigation of Escherichia coli biofilm inhibition by plant extract ursolic acid.

Dacheng Ren, Rongjun Zuo, Andrés F González Barrios, Laura A Bedzyk, Gary R Eldridge, Mark E Pasmore, Thomas K Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Delving into the Mechanisms of Sponge-AssociatedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Dual Burst and Sustained Release ofACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Antibiofilm properties ofAccess microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Impact of Gene Repression on Biofilm Formation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  19. Medicinal Chemistry of Inhibitors Targeting Resistant Bacteria.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dacheng RenDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, 191 Auditorium Rd., Storrs, CT 06269-3222, USA.
Rongjun Zuo
Andrés F González Barrios
Laura A Bedzyk
Gary R Eldridge
Mark E Pasmore
Thomas K Wood
University of Connecticut · USMontana State University · USSequoia Sciences (United States) · USWilmington University · US

Funding

Control of Biofilms by Natural ProductsR42RR016363 · NCRR · SEQUOIA SCIENCES, INC. · PI COSTERTON, JOHN WILLIAM · 2003 to 2004
$1.2M
NCRR NIH HHS 2R42RR016363-02NCRR NIH HHS R42 RR016363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After 13,000 samples of compounds purified from plants were screened, a new biofilm inhibitor, ursolic acid, has been discovered and identified. Using both 96-well microtiter plates and a continuous flow chamber with COMSTAT analysis, 10 microg of ursolic acid/ml inhibited Escherichia coli biofilm formation 6- to 20-fold when added upon inoculation and when added to a 24-h biofilm; however, ursolic acid was not toxic to E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Vibrio harveyi, and hepatocytes. Similarly, 10 microg of ursolic acid/ml inhibited biofilm formation by >87% for P. aeruginosa in both complex and minimal medium and by 57% for V. harveyi in minimal medium. To investigate the mechanism of this nontoxic inhibition on a global genetic basis, DNA microarrays were used to study the gene expression profiles of E. coli K-12 grown with or without ursolic acid. Ursolic acid at 10 and 30 microg/ml induced significantly (P < 0.05) 32 and 61 genes, respectively, and 19 genes were consistently induced. The consistently induced genes have functions for chemotaxis and mobility (cheA, tap, tar, and motAB), heat shock response (hslSTV and mopAB), and unknown functions (such as b1566 and yrfHI). There were 31 and 17 genes repressed by 10 and 30 microg of ursolic acid/ml, respectively, and 12 genes were consistently repressed that have functions in cysteine synthesis (cysK) and sulfur metabolism (cysD), as well as unknown functions (such as hdeAB and yhaDFG). Ursolic acid inhibited biofilms without interfering with quorum sensing, as shown with the V. harveyi AI-1 and AI-2 reporter systems. As predicted by the differential gene expression, deleting motAB counteracts ursolic acid inhibition (the paralyzed cells no longer become too motile). Based on the differential gene expression, it was also discovered that sulfur metabolism (through cysB) affects biofilm formation (in the absence of ursolic acid).

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialBiofilmsDiospyrosEscherichia coli K12Escherichia coli ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPlant ExtractsTriterpenesUrsolic AcidEscherichia coli ProteinsPlant ExtractsTriterpenesUrsolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID16000817
PMCPMC1169008
OpenAlexW2157981078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.