Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16000805›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2005

Development of a recA gene-based identification approach for the entire Burkholderia genus.

George W Payne, Peter Vandamme, Sara H Morgan, John J Lipuma, Tom Coenye, Andrew J Weightman, T Hefin Jones, Eshwar Mahenthiralingam

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Genomic diversity of culturableMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Quorum sensing in theApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The First Case of a Cat Infected withVeterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Isolation ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Activity of ETX0462 toward SomeAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  15. Polyyne-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Specific biomarker mining and rapid detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. A Wild Rice RhizobacteriumInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular Research Comparing the Probabilities ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2022
    Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

George W PayneCardiff School of Biosciences, Main Building, Museum Avenue, PO Box 915, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales CF10 3TL, United Kingdom.
Peter Vandamme
Sara H Morgan
John J Lipuma
Tom Coenye
Andrew J Weightman
T Hefin Jones
Eshwar Mahenthiralingam
Cardiff University · GBGhent University · BEUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burkholderia is an important bacterial genus containing species of ecological, biotechnological, and pathogenic interest. With their taxonomy undergoing constant revision and the phenotypic similarity of several species, correct identification of Burkholderia is difficult. A genetic scheme based on the recA gene has greatly enhanced the identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex species. However, the PCR developed for the latter approach was limited by its specificity for the complex. By alignment of existing and novel Burkholderia recA sequences, we designed new PCR primers and evaluated their specificity by testing a representative panel of Burkholderia strains. PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of an 869-bp portion of the Burkholderia recA gene was not sufficiently discriminatory. Nucleotide sequencing followed by phylogenetic analysis of this recA fragment differentiated both putative and known Burkholderia species and all members of the B. cepacia complex. In addition, it enabled the design of a Burkholderia genus-specific recA PCR that produced a 385-bp amplicon, the sequence of which was also able to discriminate all species examined. Phylogenetic analysis of 188 novel recA genes enabled clarification of the taxonomic position of several important Burkholderia strains and revealed the presence of four novel B. cepacia complex recA lineages. Although the recA phylogeny could not be used as a means to differentiate B. cepacia complex strains recovered from clinical infection versus the natural environment, it did facilitate the identification of clonal strain types of B. cepacia, B. stabilis, and B. ambifaria capable of residing in both niches.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesBurkholderiaBurkholderia InfectionsDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersEnvironmental MicrobiologyHumansMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRec A RecombinasesSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersRec A Recombinases

Identifiers

PMID16000805
PMCPMC1169057
OpenAlexW2104503858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.