Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16000482›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Interpretive criteria for use of AccuProbe for identification of Mycobacterium avium complex directly from 7H9 broth cultures.

Joann L Cloud, Karen C Carroll, Samuel Cohen, Clint M Anderson, Gail L Woods

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joann L CloudARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA. cloudjl@aruplab.com
Karen C Carroll
Samuel Cohen
Clint M Anderson
Gail L Woods

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid identification of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is possible by use of AccuProbe (Gen-Probe, San Diego, Calif.). To evaluate the reliability of the MAC AccuProbe for testing 7H9 cultures inoculated with broth from MGIT cultures positive for acid-fast bacilli or growth on a solid medium, we compared probe results to results obtained by sequencing a portion of the 16S rRNA gene. Isolates were sequenced if the MAC probe result was <100,000 relative light units (RLU) or if it was > or =100,000 RLU and the colony morphology was not classic or there were two colony types. For the 1,389 cultures tested in phase 1, conducted to evaluate cutoff values for the MAC probe in testing of 7H9 cultures inoculated with broth from MGIT cultures, the sensitivity and specificity of the MAC AccuProbe were 97.7% and 88.8%, respectively, according to the manufacturer's interpretive criteria (> or =30,000 RLU is positive). If the cutoff for a positive result were 80,000 RLU, the specificity would be 100% and the sensitivity 92.3%. Of the 344 isolates in phase 2, which was conducted to confirm the 80,000-RLU cutoff for a positive result and therefore included only isolates with a MAC probe result of < or =100,000 RLU, 13 of 16 with results of > or =30,000 but <80,000 RLU were identified as mycobacteria other than MAC, including five Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. These data support the use of 80,000 RLU as the cutoff for a positive result in testing of 7H9 broth cultures with the MAC AccuProbe.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesBacteriological TechniquesCulture MediaDNA ProbesDNA, RibosomalHumansMolecular Probe TechniquesMycobacterium avium ComplexMycobacterium avium-intracellulare InfectionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNACulture MediaDNA ProbesDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID16000482
PMCPMC1169162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.