Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16000471›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Prevalence of SCCmec type IV in nosocomial bloodstream isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Priscila de A Trindade, Renata L Pacheco, Silvia F Costa, Flavia Rossi, Antonio A Barone, Elsa M Mamizuka, Anna S Levin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The History of Methicillin-ResistantThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. SCCmec and spa types of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in Israel. Detection of SCCmec type V.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The Frequency ofInternational journal of fertility & sterility
    Article
  14. MRSA from Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil: intriguing epidemiological differences compared to other Brazilian regions.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Priscila de A TrindadeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, LIM 54, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo, Rua Harmonia 564/52, São Paulo-SP 05435000, Brazil.
Renata L Pacheco
Silvia F Costa
Flavia Rossi
Antonio A Barone
Elsa M Mamizuka
Anna S Levin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over a period of 7 months, 151 consecutive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus blood isolates were evaluated. None was community acquired. Twenty (13%) were susceptible to four or more antimicrobials, and 95% of these isolates were identified as SCCmec type IV. Molecular typing demonstrated four patterns, with one predominant pattern. Although usually community acquired, SCCmec type IV in our setting is clearly nosocomial.

Indexed as

Methicillin ResistanceAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacterial ProteinsBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCross InfectionHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsmecA protein, Staphylococcus aureusPenicillin-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16000471
PMCPMC1169112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.