Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16000464›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Rapid diagnosis of bacterial meningitis by real-time PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Sven Poppert, Andreas Essig, Barbara Stoehr, Adelinde Steingruber, Beate Wirths, Stefan Juretschko, Udo Reischl, Nele Wellinghausen

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. High-yield gamma-aminobutyric acid synthesis by wild-type Levilactobacillus brevis strains isolated from traditional Iranian Kashk.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rapid and Accurate Diagnosis of Acute Pyogenic Meningitis Due toJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: The Role of Emerging Diagnostic Technologies.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Direct identification of major Gram-negative pathogens in respiratory specimens by respiFISH® HAP Gram (-) Panel, a beacon-based FISH methodology.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sven PoppertDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. sven.poppert@medizin.uni-ulm.de
Andreas Essig
Barbara Stoehr
Adelinde Steingruber
Beate Wirths
Stefan Juretschko
Udo Reischl
Nele Wellinghausen
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were evaluated as rapid methods for the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis and compared to standard diagnostic procedures. For PCR, a LightCycler approach was chosen, implementing eubacterial and specific PCR assays for the most relevant bacteria. For FISH, a similar probe set containing eubacterial and specific probes was composed of published and newly designed probes. Both methods were evaluated by use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from patients with suspected bacterial meningitis. For all microscopy- and culture-positive samples (n = 28), the eubacterial PCR was positive. In addition, all identifiable pathogens were detected with specific PCR assays, according to an algorithm based on the Gram stain. The FISH method detected the pathogen in 13 of 18 positive samples. While the FISH method remained negative for all microscopy- and culture-negative samples (n = 113), the eubacterial PCR was positive for five of these samples. Sequencing of the amplicon revealed the presence of Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Haemophilus influenzae in three of these five samples. In addition, samples with discordant results by culture and microscopy were successfully investigated by PCR (10 samples) and FISH (5 samples). In conclusion, PCR is a highly sensitive tool for rapid diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. FISH is less sensitive but is useful for the identification of CSF samples showing bacteria in the Gram stain. Based on our results, an approach for laboratory diagnosis of meningitis including PCR and FISH is discussed.

Indexed as

In Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceCerebrospinal FluidCulture MediaDNA, BacterialDNA ProbesGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive CocciHumansMeningitis, BacterialMicroscopyPolymerase Chain ReactionTime FactorsCulture MediaDNA, BacterialDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID16000464
PMCPMC1169125
OpenAlexW2064732115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.