Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16000429›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a nitrate reductase assay applied directly on microscopy-positive sputum samples.

Humberto R Musa, Marta Ambroggi, Alejandro Souto, K A Kristian Angeby

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Identification ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Advances in Diagnostic Assays for Tuberculosis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2015
    Review
  5. Impact of rapid drug susceptibility testing for tuberculosis: program experience in Lima, Peru.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2012
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Programmatic implementation of rapid DST for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Peru.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Timely diagnosis of MDR-TB under program conditions: is rapid drug susceptibility testing sufficient?The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Humberto R MusaLaboratorio de Micobacteriología, Hospital F. J. Muñiz, Buenos Aires, Argentina. humbertomusa@hotmail.com
Marta Ambroggi
Alejandro Souto
K A Kristian Angeby
Hospital Muñiz · ARSwedish Institute · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current methods for drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are either costly or slow. As the prevalence of multidrug-resistant strains increases, the need for fast, reliable, and inexpensive methods that can also be applied in settings with scarce resources is obvious. We evaluated a rapid colorimetric nitrate reductase assay (NRA) for direct drug susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis directly from clinical sputum samples with positive microscopy results for acid-fast bacilli with more than 10 acid-fast bacilli per high-power field. We have saved valuable time by omitting the preisolation step. The sensitivity (ability to detect true drug resistance) and specificity (ability to detect true drug susceptibility) of the direct NRA, using the direct proportion method as the reference, were 100 and 100%, 93 and 100%, 76 and 100%, and 55 and 99% for rifampin, isoniazid, streptomycin, and ethambutol, respectively, when tested on M. tuberculosis strains present in 121 samples. The results were in most cases available in 14 days. The direct NRA could be used as a rapid, inexpensive, and accurate method to determine rifampin and isoniazid susceptibility directly from sputum. The technique might become a valid alternative to traditional methods, especially in low-income countries.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsArgentinaColorimetryDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopyMycobacterium tuberculosisNitrate ReductaseNitrate ReductasesSensitivity and SpecificitySputumTime FactorsTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntitubercular AgentsNitrate ReductaseNitrate Reductases

Identifiers

PMID16000429
PMCPMC1169123
OpenAlexW2136396504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.