Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16000419›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Comparison of multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, spa typing, and multilocus sequence typing for clonal characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Natalia Malachowa, Artur Sabat, Marek Gniadkowski, Jolanta Krzyszton-Russjan, Joanna Empel, Jacek Miedzobrodzki, Klaudia Kosowska-Shick, Peter C Appelbaum, Waleria Hryniewicz

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methicillin-ResistantToxins · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Homology analysis of 51 penicillin-intermediateThe Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Article
  9. Control of Methicillin-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Molecular prophage typing ofJournal of veterinary science · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalia MalachowaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Cracow, Poland.
Artur Sabat
Marek Gniadkowski
Jolanta Krzyszton-Russjan
Joanna Empel
Jacek Miedzobrodzki
Klaudia Kosowska-Shick
Peter C Appelbaum
Waleria Hryniewicz
National Institute of Public Health · PLJagiellonian University · PLPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA), a new PCR-based method of typing Staphylococcus aureus, was compared to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), spa typing, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) on a group of 59 S. aureus (mostly methicillin-resistant) clinical isolates. The aim of the study was to establish possible criteria of clustering MLVA patterns and to check concordance levels between the results produced by MLVA and the three other typing methods. As in our earlier study, MLVA turned out to have discriminatory power similar to that of PFGE. Comparison of data obtained by the two approaches allowed us to propose a 70% or ca. 80% cutoff value of the similarity between two MLVA patterns, depending on a cutoff level applied to interpret the PFGE results, 75% or ca. 90%, respectively. The cutoff values corresponded to the difference of up to six or four bands, respectively, among maximum 14 bands in total produced by two isolates in the analysis. The MLVA clusters matched well those obtained by PFGE, and they were also consistent in general with clusters generated by spa typing and MLST, these latter methods characterized lower resolution. Our results suggest that MLVA may be reliable in shorter-term S. aureus epidemiological studies, including analyses of outbreaks and hospital-to-hospital strain transmission events. Well-known advantages of typing methods based on PCR (low cost, short time, and easiness of performance) make MLVA a method that may be useful in a variety of laboratories, including those performing routine microbiological analyses within medical centers.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldHumansMethicillinMethicillin ResistanceMinisatellite RepeatsSequence Analysis, DNAStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsMethicillinstreptococcal protective antigen

Identifiers

PMID16000419
PMCPMC1169160
OpenAlexW1975585714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.