Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15998718›Full record

ArticleGenetics2005

Cost of interacting with sexual partners in a facultative sexual microbe.

Jianping Xu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unisexual reproduction.Advances in genetics · 2014
    Review
  5. Is sex necessary?BMC biology · 2011
    Article
  6. The evolution of sex: a perspective from the fungal kingdom.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2010
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Fungal sex and pathogenesis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2010
    Review
  9. A quasispecies approach to the evolution of sexual replication in unicellular organisms.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2008
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Establishment of facultative sexuals.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2007
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jianping XuDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada. jpxu@mcmaster.ca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread occurrence of sexual organisms despite the high costs of sex has long intrigued biologists. The best-known costs are the twofold cost of producing males and the cost associated with producing traits to attract mates and to interact with mating partners, such as exaggerated sexual behaviors and morphological modifications. These costs have been inferred from studies of plants and animals but are thought to be absent in facultative sexual microbes. Here, using the facultative sexual fungus Cryptococcus neoformans, I provide experimental evidence showing that: (i) interactions with active sexual partners can be costly for vegetative fitness in a facultative sexual microbe; (ii) this cost is positively correlated to mating ability; (iii) this cost is composed of at least two distinct components, the cost of producing mating signals that exert effects on mating partners and that associated with responding to active mating partners; and (iv) extended asexual reproduction can reduce both components of the cost. This cost must have been compensated for by the production of zygotes and sexual spores to allow the initial evolution and spread of sexual reproduction in eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSexCell CountCryptococcus neoformansCulture MediaNitrogenReproductionCulture MediaNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID15998718
PMCPMC1456087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.