Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15997356›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2005

[First responder defibrillation in the USA, Europe and Germany--prerequisites, experiences, perspectives].

H-J Trappe

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

H-J TrappeMedizinische Klinik II (Schwerpunkte Kardiologie und Angiologie), Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625 Herne, Germany. Hans-Joachim.Trappe@ruhr-unibochum.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death and only 5-8% of patients survive such event. Defibrillation is the mose effective treatment and should performed within 5 minutes; however, its effectiveness diminishes with each passing minute. "Early defibrillation" is the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) by trained public-safety personnal ("first responder"), whereas "public access" defibrillation describes AED use by persons who have no specific AED training. Several studies in the US and in Europe show that first responder defibrillation will increase the number of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared to paramedics. This is caused by a shorter "call-to-arrival-time" in first responders compared to paramedics. In Europe, programs for the use of automated external defibrillators exist only occasionally. Reasons for this are the lack of open-mindedness, logistic and legal problems. In Germany, there are only few AED programs with promising results. At the present time, placement of automated external defibrillators in public places frequented by a large number of susceptible people will increase overall survival. However, placement of AEDs in all public places is still debatable and further studies are necessary to estimate the potential impact of publicc access defibrillators.

Indexed as

DefibrillatorsAmbulatory CareCritical CareElectric CountershockEmergency Medical ServicesEuropeGermanyHeart ArrestHumansUnited States

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.