Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15997337›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2005

Distribution of chlorophyll-bearing organelles in the shoot apex of a range of dicotyledonous plants.

D Spencer, R G White, S G Wildman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D SpencerCSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia.
R G White
S G Wildman
Plant Industry · AUUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to study the distribution of the smallest detectable autofluorescing, chlorophyll-bearing structures in fresh, 40 microm thick longitudinal sections of the shoot apex of four dicotyledonous plants (Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana glauca, Lupinus alba, and Spinacia oleracea). In all species, the smallest chlorophyll-bearing particles were found in the outermost cell layers (L1 and L2) of the shoot apex. Their distribution between these layers differed in each species. The smallest such particles were about 0.5-1.0 microm in maximum dimension, approximating the size of a single granum in the developing leaf. Their size and abundance increased with increasing cell age and distance from the peak of the apex. Immediately beneath the L1 and L2 layers was a zone largely devoid of these particles. Below this nonfluorescing zone, in the region where the derivatives of the meristematic zone differentiate into cells of the central pith region, the size and abundance of the chlorophyll-bearing particles increased progressively with increasing distance from the nonfluorescing zone. The presence of these small autofluorescing particles in the L1 and L2 cell layers of the shoot apex places the development of photosystem II fluorescence at an earlier stage of leaf development than previously observed. The use of confocal laser scanning microscopy to study unfixed sections provides another useful metabolic marker for mapping patterns of differentiation and development in the cells of the shoot apex.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisChlorophyllLupinusMagnoliopsidaMicroscopy, ConfocalNicotianaOrganellesPlant ShootsSpinacia oleraceaChlorophyll

Identifiers

PMID15997337
OpenAlexW2032308861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.