Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15996965›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005

Impact on patients of expanded, general practice based, student teaching: observational and qualitative study.

John Benson, Thelma Quince, Arthur Hibble, Thomas Fanshawe, Jon Emery

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00627822 (Patient and Companion Perspectives on Medical Education in a Non-Teaching Private Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00627822 completednot on this map

Patient and Companion Perspectives on Medical Education in a Non-Teaching Private Hospital

TypeobservationalSponsorInstituto do Cerebro de BrasiliaRan2005 to 2006Enrolled209ConditionsHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Patient participation in general practice based undergraduate teaching: a focus group study of patient perspectives.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  6. Undergraduate medical students' empathy: current perspectives.Advances in medical education and practice · 2016
    Review
  7. Clinical teaching with emotional intelligence: A teaching toolbox.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2016
    Review
  8. Challenges of the ward round teaching based on the experiences of medical clinical teachers.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Is the Irish bedside best?Irish journal of medical science · 2010
    Article
  15. Why tomorrow's doctors need primary care today.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2010
    Article
  16. Medical learning in a private hospital: patients' and companions' perspectives.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2009
    Article
  17. Patients' perceptions and experiences of family medicine residents in the office.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2008
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Benefits and Barriers to Teaching Medical Students in an Ob-Gyn Clinic.Health services research and managerial epidemiology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John BensonGeneral Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 2SR. jab62@medschl.cam.ac.uk
Thelma Quince
Arthur Hibble
Thomas Fanshawe
Jon Emery

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare patients' enablement and satisfaction after teaching and non-teaching consultations. To explore patients' views about the possible impact that increased community based teaching of student doctors in their practice may have on the delivery of service and their attitudes towards direct involvement with students.

designObservational study using validated survey instruments (patient enablement index--PEI, and consultation satisfaction questionnaire--CSQ) administered after teaching consultations and non-teaching consultations. Ten focus groups (two from each practice), comprising five with patients participating in prearranged teaching sessions and five with patients not participating in these.

settingFive general practices in west Suffolk and southern Norfolk, England, that teach student doctors on the Cambridge graduate medical course.

participants240 patients attending teaching consultations (response rate 82%, 196 patients) and 409 patients attending non-teaching consultations (response rate 72%, 294 patients) received survey instruments. Ten focus groups with a total of 34 patients participating in prearranged teaching sessions and 20 patients not participating in these.

main outcome measuresScores on the patient enablement index and consultation satisfaction questionnaire, analysed at the level of all patients, allowing for age, sex, general practitioner, and practice, and at the level of the individual general practitioner teacher. Qualitative analysis of focus group data.

resultsPatients' enablement or satisfaction was not reduced after teaching consultations compared with non-teaching consultations (mean difference in scores on the patient enablement index and consultation satisfaction questionnaire with adjustment for confounders 2.24% and 1.70%, respectively). This held true for analysis by all patients and by general practitioner teacher. Qualitative data showed that patients generally supported the teaching of student doctors in their practice. However, this support was conditional on receiving sufficient information about reasons for doctors' absence, the characteristics of students, and the nature of teaching planned. Many patients viewed their general practice as different from hospital and expected greater control over students' presence during their consultations.

conclusionsPatients' enablement and satisfaction are not impaired by students' participation in consultations. Patients generally support the teaching of student doctors in their general practice but expect to be provided with sufficient information and to have a choice about participation, so they can give informed consent. Recognising this when organising general practice based teaching is important.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdultAgedDelivery of Health CareEducation, Medical, GraduateEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsTeaching

Identifiers

PMID15996965
PMCPMC558616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.