Trial reportDiabetologia2005
Lack of effect of intermittently administered sodium fusidate in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus: the FUSIDM trial.
Trial report in Diabetologia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions for latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA) in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011 · on this mapPooled it
- A Historical and Epistemological Review of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Metabolic Functional Feature of Gut Microbiota in Mongolian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Antibiotics in the pathogenesis of diabetes and inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisWe evaluated in a double-blind study the effect of early treatment with the immunomodulatory drug fusidin in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus.
methodsTwenty-eight adults with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned (computer-generated random number sequence) to two experimental groups. Patients allocated to the fusidin (FUS) group (n=15) received sodium fusidate (fusidin; 500 mg orally three times daily for 4 weeks). Subsequently the drug was given at the same dose and scheduled for two consecutive weeks a month followed by 2 weeks a month without the drug for 20 weeks. Subjects allocated to the placebo (PCB) group (n=13) received placebo according to the same schedule and conditions described for sodium fusidate in the FUS group. All patients received a diet adjusted to their age and BMI, and intensive insulin therapy.
resultsThere were no statistically significant differences between the FUS and PCB groups in beta cell function, evaluated by basal and glucagon-stimulated C-peptide values during the follow-up (24 and 48 weeks). There was also no difference between the two groups in insulin requirement after 48 weeks (0.4+/-0.2 and 0.4+/-0.2 U/kg body weight for the FUS and PCB groups, respectively). Antibody titres, including insulin autoantibodies, were similar in the two groups during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationEarly treatment of newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients with intermittently administered fusidin failed to influence the natural course of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.