Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15995653›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2005

New approaches to quantifying the spread of infection.

Louise Matthews, Mark Woolhouse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transmission of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) during animal transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Key data for outbreak evaluation: building on the Ebola experience.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Acceleration of evolutionary spread by long-range dispersal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. How to make predictions about future infectious disease risks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2011
    Review
  18. Data-model fusion to better understand emerging pathogens and improve infectious disease forecasting.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Louise MatthewsVeterinary Epidemiology Group, Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, Scotland. Louise.Matthews@ed.ac.uk
Mark Woolhouse

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent major disease outbreaks, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome and foot-and-mouth disease in the UK, coupled with fears of emergence of human-to-human transmissible variants of avian influenza, have highlighted the importance of accurate quantification of disease threat when relatively few cases have occurred. Traditional approaches to mathematical modelling of infectious diseases deal most effectively with large outbreaks in large populations. The desire to elucidate the highly variable dynamics of disease spread amongst small numbers of individuals has fuelled the development of models that depend more directly on surveillance and contact-tracing data. This signals a move towards a closer interplay between epidemiological modelling, surveillance and disease-management strategies.

Indexed as

Contact TracingDisease OutbreaksPopulation SurveillanceAnimalsBirdsCaliciviridae InfectionsCattleCattle DiseasesCommunicable DiseasesCross InfectionEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli O157Foot-and-Mouth DiseaseHumansInfluenza in BirdsMeasles

Identifiers

PMID15995653
PMCPMC7096817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.