Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15994216›Full record

Trial reportGut2006

Cost effectiveness of interferon alpha or peginterferon alpha with ribavirin for histologically mild chronic hepatitis C.

R Grieve, J Roberts, M Wright, M Sweeting, D DeAngelis, W Rosenberg, M Bassendine, J Main, H Thomas

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. SASLT practice guidelines: management of hepatitis C virus infection.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2012
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Modeling the Health Economic Burden of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Turkey: Cost-Effectiveness of Targeted Screening.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Cost-effectiveness of Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Models for People Who Inject Drugs in Opioid Agonist Treatment Programs.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Optimal timing of hepatitis C treatment among HIV/HCV coinfected ESRD patients: Pre- vs posttransplant.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2019
    Article
  12. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Shortened Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2019
    Article
  13. Population level outcomes and cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment pre- vs postkidney transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Cost-Effectiveness of One-Time Hepatitis C Screening Strategies Among Adolescents and Young Adults in Primary Care Settings.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hepatitis C disease transmission and treatment uptake: impact on the cost-effectiveness of new direct-acting antiviral therapies.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

R GrieveHealth Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK. richard.grieve@lshtm.ac.uk
J Roberts
M Wright
M Sweeting
D DeAngelis
W Rosenberg
M Bassendine
J Main
H Thomas
Imperial College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMRC Biostatistics Unit · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0502028Medical Research Council G106/1173Medical Research Council MC_U105260556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with mild chronic hepatitis C the cost effectiveness of antiviral therapy is unknown.

aimsTo assess whether antiviral therapy (either interferon alpha or peginterferon alpha combined with ribavirin) is cost effective at a mild stage compared with waiting and only treating those cases who progress to moderate disease. PATIENTS: Cases with mild chronic hepatitis C.

methodsA cost effectiveness model which estimates long term costs and outcomes for patients with mild chronic hepatitis C. The model uses effectiveness and cost data from the UK mild hepatitis C randomised controlled trial, combined with estimates of disease progression and cost from observational studies.

resultsAntiviral treatment at a mild rather than a moderate stage improved outcomes measured by quality adjusted life years (QALYS) gained. The mean cost per QALY gained from antiviral treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin, compared with no treatment at a mild stage, was 4535 pounds sterling (7108 dollars) for patients with genotype non-1 and 25,188 pounds sterling (39,480 dollars) for patients with genotype 1. Providing peginterferon alpha-2b and ribavirin at a mild rather than a moderate stage was also associated with a gain in QALYS; the costs per QALY gained were 7821 pounds sterling (12,259 dollars) for patients with genotype non-1 and 28,409 pounds sterling (44,528 dollars) for patients with genotype 1.

conclusionsFor patients with chronic hepatitis C, it is generally more cost effective to provide antiviral treatment at a mild rather than a moderate disease stage. For older patients (aged 65 years or over) with genotype 1, antiviral treatment at a mild stage is not cost effective.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntiviral AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ProgressionDrug CostsDrug Therapy, CombinationHealth Care CostsHepatitis C, ChronicHumansInterferon-alphaInterferon alpha-2Middle AgedModels, EconometricPolyethylene GlycolsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAntiviral AgentsInterferon-alphaInterferon alpha-2peginterferon alfa-2bPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant ProteinsRibavirin

Identifiers

PMID15994216
PMCPMC1860032
OpenAlexW2163731183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.