ArticleAtencion primaria2005
[Prescription medicines information: Spanish general population survey].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Access to medicines for acute illness in middle income countries in Central America.Revista de saude publica · 2013Article
- [Do we inform patients correctly when we prescribe an antibiotic?].Atencion primaria · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess Spanish general population opinion on prescription medicine information which they currently access or would like to. Design. Cross-sectional descriptive study through telephone interviews. Setting. Spanish general population. February-March 2003.
participantsA total of 1069 subjects from 16 to 90 years old were interviewed. Main measures. Questionnaire developed after reviewing legislation and literature, and validated by an expert panel in medical information.
resultsA total of 87.7% of subjects usually obtain medicines upon medical prescription. The most important prescription medicine information sources are drug information leaflet (75.9%; 95% CI, 73.3-78.5), physicians (54.9%; 95% CI, 51.8-58.0), pharmacists (17.4%; 95% CI, 15.1-19.7 and nurses (6.7%; 95% CI, 5.2-8.2). Less than 3% of subjects obtain prescription medicine information through Internet. A total of 52.9% (95% CI, 49.9-55.8) of subjects feel they are inadequately informed about prescription medicine and would like to have more access to it through sources different than health care staff. A total of 45.6% (95% CI, 42.6-48.6) of subjects would find convenient to receive information from pharmaceutical companies. This information should be qualified and supervised by health authorities. Brief written materials provided by physicians or pharmacists, would be the most appropriate way for patients to obtain prescription medicine information from pharmaceutical companies.
conclusionsSpanish general population feel they have poor information on prescription medicine and would like to get access to qualified information from different sources, including the one provided by the pharmaceutical industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.